Re: [Proftpd-devel] mod_tls.html#TLSProtocol

2017-03-06 Thread Christian
Am 07.03.2017 um 01:42 schrieb TJ Saunders: > The website's docs are usually for the latest stable release, not for > the upcoming stable release. http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4114#c4 Resolved in 1.3.5a, 1.3.6rc1. thought 1.3.5 is latest stable release. Isn't it ? -- Christian -

Re: [Proftpd-devel] mod_tls.html#TLSProtocol

2017-03-06 Thread TJ Saunders
> See: > > http://www.proftpd.org/docs/contrib/mod_tls.html#TLSProtocol The website's docs are usually for the latest stable release, not for the upcoming stable release. TJ -- Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries

Re: [Proftpd-devel] mod_tls.html#TLSProtocol

2017-03-06 Thread Christian
Am 07.03.2017 um 01:29 schrieb TJ Saunders: > See: > > http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4114 > > https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/commit/f2199008828428a9e4531c0b01cb0f9dd3b91624 See: http://www.proftpd.org/docs/contrib/mod_tls.html#TLSProtocol lacks some update then. Cheers

Re: [Proftpd-devel] mod_tls.html#TLSProtocol

2017-03-06 Thread TJ Saunders
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, at 15:38, Christian wrote: > Hi, > > should the Default for TLSProtocol not be changed ? > I might be wrong, but SSLv3 is known to be weak. See: http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4114 https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/commit/f2199008828428a9e4531c0b01cb0f9dd3b9