On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Richard Vaughan <rlvaug...@comcast.net> wrote:
> I just used a single coefficient as an example. It was the dyadic case
> (i.e. evaluated at x) that puzzled me; it didn't seem to be working as
> advertised.
Oh, yes... you are correct.
It's pretty easy to see that the listed definition does not match the
implementation.
Here's an implementation that matches the dyadic definition:
dytay=: (1 :0) ("0)
:
(x^y) * u t. y
)
0 1 2 ^dytay/ 0 1 2
1 0 0
1 1 0.5
1 2 2
0 1 2 ^t./ 0 1 2
1 1 1
_ 1 0.5
_ _ 1
That said, I am not seeing why this definition is useful.
Am I missing an important concept?
--
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
