Thank you, Ric and especially Bob!
Bob Therriault wrote:
> Is there a reason that you would not be able to add the spaces at
> the end using iji # ?
>
> sqdata=. 'X@@.@..@@...@'
> e=.5 5 $ e3 { sqdata
> 1j1#"1 e
My original version was along your lines (that is, no spaces until the
I was wanting to get a feel for if I was on the right track but that is
pretty easy to add that too if need be:
1j1&#"1 ((e3 e."1 {.f)+e3 e."1 f)}'.','@',:5 5$'X'
. @ . . .
. @ @ . .
. X . @ .
. @ . . .
. . . . @
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:49 PM, bob therriault wrote:
> Yeah, I picked that up
Yeah, I picked that up off of Raul in a codeGolf thing we did last summer.
I like your way of generating the matrix but it doesn't have the 'X' for the 0
in Harvey's original example. I just relied on sqdata being defined so I am
really not being critical :)
Cheers, bob
On 2012-12-03, at 9:3
Thanks Bob, I was trying to work out how to insert alternate spaces and
1j1# is nicer than my solution. Here is a simplification of my earlier
idea:
1j1&#"1 (e3 e."1 f)} (5 5$'.'),:'@'
. @ . . .
. @ @ . .
. @ . @ .
. @ . . .
. . . . @
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:13 PM, bob therriault wrote:
Harvey,
Is there a reason that you would not be able to add the spaces at the end using
iji # ?
e3=. 12 13 14 15 16 11 2 3 4 17 10 1 0 5 18 9 8 7 6 19 24 23 22 21 20
e3
12 13 14 15 16 11 2 3 4 17 10 1 0 5 18 9 8 7 6 19 24 23 22 21 20
sqdata=. 'X@@.@..@@...@….' NB. Spaces remo
Does this provide something similar to what you are wanting?
e3=: 5 5$ e3
;"1 (e3 e."1 f)} (5 5$<'. '),:<'@ '
. @ . . .
. @ @ . .
. @ . @ .
. @ . . .
. . . . @
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:21 PM, PackRat wrote:
> I have an application where I have a numeric evolute that I want to
> visualiz
I have an application where I have a numeric evolute that I want to
visualize. Essentially, I have a list of values within the evolute
that I want to display as a given literal character, while the
remaining values would be a default "background" literal character.
Everything works fine until
A workaround has been committed to JAL, please update and try again.
Пнд, 03 Дек 2012, David Ward Lambert писал(а):
> Sadly, the current j version 7 version of the "Object Oriented
> Programming" is broken.
>
> Lab: Object Oriented Programming
> To advance the lab, press Ctrl-. in JHS or Ctrl-J i
I find myself using J602 for labs (the instructional value is still valid in
most cases).
Cheers, bob
On 2012-12-03, at 1:06 PM, David Ward Lambert wrote:
> Sadly, the current j version 7 version of the "Object Oriented
> Programming" is broken.
>
> Lab: Object Oriented Programming
> To advance
Sadly, the current j version 7 version of the "Object Oriented
Programming" is broken.
Lab: Object Oriented Programming
To advance the lab, press Ctrl-. in JHS or Ctrl-J in Gtk.
On a tablet your mileage may vary.
── (1 of 70) Overview ───
This lab is about Obje
Alex,
I think I would point them towards first the 'Locales" lab and then the "Object
Oriented Programming" lab. I think that these two labs would give object
oriented people lots of information about how J can be used as an object
oriented language.
Cheers, bob
On 2012-12-03, at 11:29 AM, Al
Thanks Marshall and Raul, and yes, of course the question assumed that
there /was/ a need for an object.
My guess is you'd get that asked a lot if people were arriving at J from OO
languages, I'd hate to be the one making the case that you don't always
need objects, even when I agree with that sta
There are several ways of translating that javascript code into J, I
would have to know something about the larger context to know which of
them I would pick.
That said, one of the simplest would be:
do_something 'bee'
do_something 'see'
Another variation would be:
b_a_=: 'bee'
s_a_=: 'see'
do_
What is causing the following errors, please?
9!:12''
5
9!:14''
j602/2008-03-03/16:45
load
'~addons/media/image3/view_m.ijs'
directory =: '/Users/brian/Pictures/'
$b =:
read_image"1 directory,'Scan2-8at300.jpeg'
|domain error: cd
| a=.'jpeg_get_info + i *c *i *i *i
*i'zj
Thanks Stefano, that's what I meant, viz. how can you access a structure
within a variable, whether its a box or whatever, by a variable that is
only defined within the context of the main variable, i.e. not an index,
but a structure name. Same as you'd do with a "struct" in C. A property,
or what
There are a lot of disclaimers here: this code, without context, is
quite useless, and typically there are easier ways to do things in J
than using objects. But here's the way I would probably do this, if I
decided that the best way to store data was to make use of values in a
locale. The key is nl
The proposed Javascript is more along the lines of: execute a function
(do_something) on the value of each (for (var prop)) of the variabiles
contained in a specified locale (a).
So, a literal translation would involve the retrieval of the list of the
variable names (b and c in the exampple, but it
I'm sure I don't understand the Javascript-specific nuances of your
question, but is a J version much different than this?
do_something"0 a=. 'bee';'see'
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Alex Giannakopoulos wrote:
> On 3 December 2012 15:59, Raul Miller wrote:
>
> > That said, when I want
On 3 December 2012 15:59, Raul Miller wrote:
> That said, when I want to translate J into a language other people
> understand, Javascript is usually my first choice.
>
Why does that not surprise me? :-)
Incidentally, and if you have nothing better to do, how would you code this
Javascript in
On 3 December 2012 15:59, Raul Miller wrote:
> Also, there isn't anything you can do with lambda notation that you
> cannot do in J. J's gerunds have all the expressiveness of lambdas,
> and you can implement anything in them up to and including call/cc.
>
Raul, you know your stuff and I always
The short answer is yes, the jdoajax can send any data it wants.
The details depend a bit on whether you are trying to do this on the
jijx page, or on a new custom grid page.
In the page form define a hidden textarea. Then put your JSON
serialized data in the textarea and jdoajax with that text a
That getting paid bit is always a bummer
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
> J's performance is a blend of the language design, Roger Hui's years
> of implementation, and probably Arthur Whitney's influence.
>
> Also, there isn't anything you can do with lambda notation tha
I am using JSON to pass the grid data from JHS to Javascript. The verb
griddatfrtd
reads TAB delimited CSV style text and builds a JSON string for DHTMLX.
What I am wondering is how to do the reverse. I can build the JSON on the
JavaScript
side but how do you post this back to JHS. jdoajax pulls
J's performance is a blend of the language design, Roger Hui's years
of implementation, and probably Arthur Whitney's influence.
Also, there isn't anything you can do with lambda notation that you
cannot do in J. J's gerunds have all the expressiveness of lambdas,
and you can implement anything i
You probably want to look at JSON. This is a serialization of any JS
object. Javascript has built in methods to serialize an object and to
create an object. The encoding is pretty straight forward and it is
easy to write equivalents in J. Note that for data there is direct
correspondence between a
Interesting. If this becomes well accepted COM may have broken out of its
MS jail.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Stefano Lanzavecchia wrote:
> > I had heard about COM in Win8.
> >
> > Is it still being promoted as a development target? It's been tolerated
> in .Net
> > for ages but always pr
> I had heard about COM in Win8.
>
> Is it still being promoted as a development target? It's been tolerated in
> .Net
> for ages but always prefaced with phrases like "legacy technology."
> COM's main drawback is that it has not caught on outside of Microsoft. For
> those of us interested in por
I had heard about COM in Win8.
Is it still being promoted as a development target? It's been tolerated in
.Net for ages but always prefaced with phrases like "legacy technology."
COM's main drawback is that it has not caught on outside of Microsoft. For
those of us interested in portable programmi
Alex Giannakopoulos wrote: "it's the *spirit* that counts."
1361: CREDO IN SPIRITUM QUI LOCUTUS EST PER PROPHETAS AMEN
- Bo
>
> Fra: Alex Giannakopoulos
>Til: [email protected]
>Sendt: 12:37 mandag den 3. december 2012
>Emne: Re: [Jprogramming] @: and
> *Ric Sherlock* tikkanz at gmail.com
> *Sun Dec 2 20:58:35 UTC 2012
>
> *The issue becomes - are we writing scripts/libraries to showcase J to
beginners
> or to provide performant utilities for users?
IMO, = if you want to push J =, there is only one answer to that question.
The old hands will w
*> Don Guinn* donguinn at gmail.com
*> Sun Dec 2 14:12:01 UTC 2012
>
>* [BASIC] and the popular programming languages today are all essentially
scalar.
> They handle one element at a time and use loops to handle arrays.
While the central point of what you are saying is definitely true, remember
t
31 matches
Mail list logo
