As long as one hasn’t understood what 'fill' is
and anticipates it happening, I recommend to
rather use ; than , ,. ,: when comparing results
of (supposedly) related verbs.
One might guess that + +. and +: could be just as similar
and try (+ , +. ,: +:) 4 5 6 the result of which would
not be very
The good news is that a dime's worth of hydro will power your Raspberry Pi for
many hours.
> On 2021Sep 5, at 14:21, joseph turco wrote:
>
> find it fascinating, and it also doesn't cost me a dime (well, other than
> the hydro).
-
Oops, when I copied and pasted d wrote:
>
> Ok, let's go with the specifics you mentioned here, first. (I couldn't
> find the part of the book which matches your expression.)
>
> The >. verb in X >. Y is *not* greater or equal. X >: Y is greater or equal.
>
> X >. Y is maximum value -- the result i
Ok, let's go with the specifics you mentioned here, first. (I couldn't
find the part of the book which matches your expression.)
The >. verb in X >. Y is *not* greater or equal. X >: Y is greater or equal.
X >. Y is maximum value -- the result is whichever values from X and Y
are the largest (mat
Hello Joseph,
Unfortunately, >. is not defined as (greater than or equal to)
It's very important to realise that
> >. and >: are three different, albeit related, primitives.
and even more important that (nearly?) all symbols or letters
used for J primitives can be monographs, or
Hey Raul,
I was speaking in context to the book 'arithmetic' not in general. In the
exercises for the first chapter for example, it says to use two user
defined verbs that the book has you define earlier in the chapter, but the
problem is, is that you never do that ( i used the search function, no
You might also want to try some of the J labs.
Also... my experience was that I needed to circle back and re-read
things after learning parts of the language. While I suppose it's
technically true that "all you need to know is how to count", that's
true in the sense that calculus is just another m
You'll have to write a J model for (u t.).
If you are doing polynomial approximation to functions, consider
Chebyshev polynomials.
Henry Rich
On 9/5/2021 2:38 PM, Hauke Rehr wrote:
Hello all,
I’m still using j807 for much of what I’m doing;
trying to port some of it to j903, I’m wondering
w
Hello all,
I’m still using j807 for much of what I’m doing;
trying to port some of it to j903, I’m wondering
what to do about the t. family the vocabulary
pages for which are silent about how to replace
them in recent versions of J.
any suggestions?
Hauke
--
--
mail written
Hello R.E.Boss
I Do not have any post-secondary education, and am solely programming just
out of recreation is the best way i can put it. Ive only dabbled in other
programming languages and didn't find them interesting. I actually Found J
after having issues getting Dyalog APL running on my 64-bit
Can you tell us a bit about your background? Did you program before? Which
languages? Why was Italian not a language to learn for fun?
Welcome anyhow!
One can have worse reasons to learn a language.
R. E. Boss
-Original Message-
From: Programming On Behalf Of
joseph turco
Sent: zate
11 matches
Mail list logo
