Re: [Jprogramming] Is a +/ operation interruptible

2022-03-02 Thread Ian Clark
> addons/dev and not all of addons? Some addons have magic words in them that would be a red rag to a bull. Other addons simply won't work – or do work but use banned techniques. For my first encounter with App Store I played safe, and supplied only a minimal set. Yes, the user may find it easier

Re: [Jprogramming] Cyclotomic Polynomials and FFT - was Re: polynomial division

2022-03-02 Thread Raul Miller
I am using fftw Thanks, -- Raul On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 7:40 PM Henry Rich wrote: > > If you are measuring performance, use fftw. > > FFT will be better on big problems. > > Henry Rich > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022, 7:35 PM Raul Miller wrote: > > > Yes, ... maybe I should replace my caching wrapper

Re: [Jprogramming] Cyclotomic Polynomials and FFT - was Re: polynomial division

2022-03-02 Thread Henry Rich
If you are measuring performance, use fftw. FFT will be better on big problems. Henry Rich On Wed, Mar 2, 2022, 7:35 PM Raul Miller wrote: > Yes, ... maybe I should replace my caching wrapper with M. > > That said, using the fft cyclotomic000 implementation and the caching > wrapper from the r

Re: [Jprogramming] Cyclotomic Polynomials and FFT - was Re: polynomial division

2022-03-02 Thread Raul Miller
Yes, ... maybe I should replace my caching wrapper with M. That said, using the fft cyclotomic000 implementation and the caching wrapper from the rosettacode page (and the fftw implementation for fft and ifft): taskorder=: {{ r=.$k=.0 while.y>#r do.k=.k+1 if.(1+#r) e.|u k do. r=. r,

Re: [Jprogramming] Cyclotomic Polynomials and FFT - was Re: polynomial division

2022-03-02 Thread 'Michael Day' via Programming
Interesting!   I've got some thoughts on this,  but it's getting late here,  so I'll defer a fuller reply. Meanwhile,  a quickie:  since the memoisation does seem to work, might it be better to dispense with cache?  A pity as you put some effort into its use,  but the code is simpler without

Re: [Jprogramming] Cyclotomic Polynomials and FFT - was Re: polynomial division

2022-03-02 Thread Raul Miller
I've updated the rosettacode page to include this implementation. And, I plan on updating the j wiki polynomial division essay, also, once I think through a bit how to describe this approach. (Descriptive phrases and sentences would be welcome. Documentation needs good perspectives, above all else.

Re: [Jprogramming] Is a +/ operation interruptible

2022-03-02 Thread Raul Miller
addons/dev and not all of addons? That surprises me (at least in the context of "That's also the workaround for absence of pacman.") -- Raul On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 6:53 AM Ian Clark wrote: > > > but perhaps Ian didn't pick it up. > > No, sorry, I didn't. It will be in the next release. > > Wor

Re: [Jprogramming] Is a +/ operation interruptible

2022-03-02 Thread Ian Clark
> but perhaps Ian didn't pick it up. No, sorry, I didn't. It will be in the next release. Workaround: copy /Applications/j903/addons/dev/ from your Mac onto your iCloud Drive, then slot it into place inside the j901.app sandbox using the Document Picker (the box+arrow icon top-right). That's als