Re: [Jprogramming] The bind conjunction

2021-12-28 Thread bill lam
Apparently both @ and ]:@("_) work. Thank you all. On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 11:32 PM 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming < programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote: > Untested but, > > Bind =: ]: @ ("_) > > > > > > > On Sunday, December 26, 2021, 04:45:08 p.m. EST, bill lam < > bbill@gmail.com> wrote: > >

Re: [Jprogramming] The bind conjunction

2021-12-27 Thread 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
Untested but, Bind =: ]: @ ("_) On Sunday, December 26, 2021, 04:45:08 p.m. EST, bill lam wrote: The conjunction in stdlib   bind 2 : 'u@(v"_)' How to write it without explicit definition, but using trains of conjunctions and adverbs resurrected in j903?

Re: [Jprogramming] The bind conjunction

2021-12-26 Thread Henry Rich
@ Some time back the addition was made for u@noun to be like u@(noun"_). Related change: to refer to the value of a name at execution time, use ".@'name' which avoids parsing overhead. Henry Rich On 12/26/2021 4:44 PM, bill lam wrote: The conjunction in stdlib bind 2 : 'u@(v"_)' How to

[Jprogramming] The bind conjunction

2021-12-26 Thread bill lam
The conjunction in stdlib bind 2 : 'u@(v"_)' How to write it without explicit definition, but using trains of conjunctions and adverbs resurrected in j903? -- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.h