So, ...
Here is my understanding of these mechanisms in the context of Linux:
JDo is designed to work within a single process. You should be able to have
several J interpreters loaded in the same process, but when running one,
you wouldn’t be running the other(s).
You might be able to work aroun
I added my **Work In Progress** machine learning library to github:
https://github.com/jonghough/jlearn
The library is mostly for didactic purposes, self learning etc. but
It may be of use, or of interest, to anyone experimenting with machine learning
using J.
Bare in mind, I am absolutely not
For the socket stuff, you can also use the zmq addon.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 6:41 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
> So, ...
>
> Here is my understanding of these mechanisms in the context of Linux:
>
> JDo is designed to work within a single process. You should be able to have
> several J interpreters l
This looks really good and will be a great help to those who want to get a
better understanding of the algorithms. Thank you for sharing
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018, 10:00 AM 'Jon Hough' via Programming <
programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
> I added my **Work In Progress** machine learning library to git
I second Joe's sentiment! This looks real good (well commented code and
lots of references/links to articles/code). Thanks for sharing.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Joe Bogner wrote:
> This looks really good and will be a great help to those who want to get a
> better understanding of the
Hi!
Currently:
Note
3 : '0 0 $ 0 : 0' :[
Example:
Note 'Details'
bla-bla
)
My variant:
Note =: 3 : '0 0 $ 0 : 0' : $:@]
Allow old and new variant:
1 Note 'Introduction'
bla-bla
)
2 Note 'Details'
bla-bla
)
Note 'Old'
bla-bla
)
Nice day!
Sergey
--
Hi Sergey,
Your version of Note will break the current dyadic design of Note as
described in the stdlib.ijs script (see extract below)
http://www.jsoftware.com/wsvn/base8/trunk/main/main/stdlib.ijs
Currently the dyadic form causes Note to render the rest of the current
line as a "comment". Your ve
I have this phrase, saved to a register in emacs, that I use for notes - it
timestamps the start and end of the note:
qts'' [ 0 : 0 [ smoutput qts''
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 6:53 PM Ric Sherlock wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
> Your version of Note will break the current dyadic design of Note as
> describe
I also quite like the idea, but am not sure it is worth the change since
the examples could equally be written as:
Note '1. Introduction'
bla-bla
)
Note '2. Details'
bla-bla
)
I don't see any examples of dyadic use in the system, but think it was
intended for teaching materials and more like
