Dear Raul and Henry
thank you for your comprehensive list of ideas and explanation.
It helped.
Ruda
March 20, 2020 11:22 PM, "Raul Miller" wrote:
> There are several ways to accomplish what I think you're asking for:
>
> Algebraic simplification:
> g=:3 :0
> -y
> )
>
> Pass the intermediat
bill lam writes:
> You seemed also got the error box for some invalid input, but then it
> crashed after 2 seconds. This is weird I don't know why.
Is there anything I can do to diagnose the issue? Ie., run the command
like
plot 1 2 ; 3 4 5
expecting that it is going to fail, but put some
When I ran this, I got a crash. But I know I am running a mongrel
system, with old JQt and unreleased JE. Since others report no error,
perhaps that's our problem? You could try making sure your JQt is up to
date.
I did look into it a little, and you could do the same. This is what I
did
Dear Henry,
Henry Rich writes:
>
> I did look into it a little, and you could do the same. This is what I
> did (in JQt):
>
> plot 1 2 ; 3 4 5
> crash - before the crash a dialog about length error in getgrafmat.
> Indeed, the arguments have incorrect length.
> load 'plot'
> open
Hi - I did this:
load 'plot'
13!:0]1 NB. Enable debugging
plot 1 2;3 4 5
|length error: getgrafmat
| ,"2(getgrafx x),."1 citemize getgrafy y
|getgrafmat[1]
y
3 4 5
x
1 2
13!:0]10 NB. turn off debugging
So, this is a legitimate error caused by the b
Sorry - typo. Last line of J should have been
13!:0]0 NB. turn off debugging
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:38 PM Devon McCormick wrote:
> Hi - I did this:
>load 'plot'
>13!:0]1 NB. Enable debugging
>plot 1 2;3 4 5
> |length error: getgrafmat
> | ,"2(getgrafx x
We are wondering why it crashes J on some systems.
Henry Rich
On 3/24/2020 6:51 PM, Devon McCormick wrote:
Sorry - typo. Last line of J should have been
13!:0]0 NB. turn off debugging
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:38 PM Devon McCormick wrote:
Hi - I did this:
load 'plot'
(5#6)?55
42 16 14 29 38 25
14 37 22 4 54 6
47 51 35 32 26 45
13 53 10 29 3 15
21 8 20 45 30 52
Don Kelly
On 2020-03-23 5:47 p.m., 'Jim Russell' via Programming wrote:
Who do I thank tor this? It is a particularly clear and helpful exclamation.
Thank you!
On Mar 13, 2020, at 3:56 AM,
5 6 ?@$ 55
52 3 9 16 4 3
26 30 24 34 30 50
46 51 16 19 26 26
20 46 12 50 39 27
3 39 45 46 46 33
:)
This actually isn't the same result as your code, though.
(4#2) ? 2
0 1
0 1
0 1
1 0
1 1 i.~ (1e6#2) ? 2
100
0 0 i.~ (1e6#2) ? 2
100
There are never any 1 1 or 0 0 results
I see your point. actually x?y (deal as in the vocabulary) doesn't
allow repetitions. An analogy is dealing a hand of cards where you will
never (legally) have 2 aces of spades . hence, with 2 cards 1 and 0, you
can't get 1 1 . If you have 2 cards each having a 1 and 0 you can get
your resu
The original requirement was to have the integers in each set of 6 be
unique in that set. Zeros are OK.
Skip
>
>
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
11 matches
Mail list logo
