On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 2:26 AM Jaume wrote:
> Because somewhere in there something broke and on the phone I have the
> wrong answer for part 1.
Yes... generally it's easier to debug if you have a much smaller implementation.
It's also a *lot* easier if you write your code so that you can test
a
Well done! Day 13 has been unlucky for me; still floundering around, not even
managing to solve the example.
Anyway, I also always try to solve the example first, if I can. One, perhaps
two, of the earlier problems did have a feature that didn't appear in the
example, though. The knotte
Missatge de Raul Miller del dia dc., 14 de des.
2022 a les 18:33:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 2:26 AM Jaume wrote:
> > Because somewhere in there something broke and on the phone I have the
> > wrong answer for part 1.
>
> Yes... generally it's easier to debug if you have a much smaller
> implemen
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 3:49 PM Jaume wrote:
> The first days I tried, now I have less time and the problems are harder.
That does happen.
I expect aoc day 24 to take me a few days to solve (unless it happens
to be a problem I somehow have already put a lot of thought into).
> I have to say th
I should add:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 4:19 PM I wrote:
...
> Here, OP was a gerund such that OP@.0 represented what monkey 0 would
> do to the "worry levels", OP@.1 represented monkey 1, and so on.
Note that a better representation here would interpret each monkey's
operation as a polynomial rath
