I think I am in the home stretch for the alpha release but I have been
thinking that for 4 weeks now.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:50 PM, William Tanksley, Jr
wrote:
> Wonderful. I'm looking forward to running it, then.
>
> -Wm
> --
Wonderful. I'm looking forward to running it, then.
-Wm
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
The answer to that is a qualified yes. The app currently sports 2
modes: a text-only console complete with editors, input log, etc. and
a JHS mode which I am currently trying to coerce some graphics out of.
I foresee 2 approaches to leveraging this package as as platform:
developing GL or tam
Sorry -- you're right, I made no sense.
I meant, does your app allow one to write J programs that run under Android?
-Wm
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Michael Dykman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:50 PM, William Tanksley, Jr
> wrote:
> > Michael Dykman wrote:
> >
> >> If I may: I have
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:50 PM, William Tanksley, Jr
wrote:
> Michael Dykman wrote:
>
>> If I may: I have already compiled J for an ARM processor under a linux
>> kernel as part of my android project. Raspberry Pi would provide a
>> more complete system than android provides so it could only be
There are so many levels to computing now. And it is getting harder to get
down to the nuts and bolts levels. Microsoft and Apple, along with
virtually every other supplier of hardware and software discourage people
from getting down to the basic hardware levels. Looks like the Rasberry
will encour
Michael Dykman wrote:
> If I may: I have already compiled J for an ARM processor under a linux
> kernel as part of my android project. Raspberry Pi would provide a
> more complete system than android provides so it could only be easier
> than that.
>
That sounds rather interesting -- I don't su
If I may: I have already compiled J for an ARM processor under a linux
kernel as part of my android project. Raspberry Pi would provide a
more complete system than android provides so it could only be easier
than that.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Edward Mokurai Cherlin
wrote:
>> Oh! And who
On Sun, February 26, 2012 12:24 pm, Don Guinn wrote:
> But it's too big and too powerful to teach real programming. To fully
> understand computers one must be forced to program at no higher than
> machine language
My father did that on the MIT Whirlwind in 1951. But in fact, all of
the programmin
But it's too big and too powerful to teach real programming. To fully
understand computers one must be forced to program at no higher than
machine language and have to handle the most basic level of hardware I/O,
optionally aided by an assembler. Wouldn't hurt to have to do a little
microcoding as
Another critical point: it costs $25 and outputs 1080p.
-Wm
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:29 AM, david alis wrote:
> I noticed this today and thought it worthwhile to post it here:
> http://www.raspberrypi.org/about
> http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs
>
> "What’s a Raspberry Pi?
>
> The Raspberry Pi
I noticed this today and thought it worthwhile to post it here:
http://www.raspberrypi.org/about
http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs
"What’s a Raspberry Pi?
The Raspberry Pi is a credit-card sized computer that
plugs into your TV and a keyboard. It’s a capable
little PC which can be used for many of
12 matches
Mail list logo
