Hi all,
A new test run is available on Moztrap to test the RC1 version of 4.2.0.
Concerning Moztrap, there is 47 tests to run, there is no obligation to
run them all, you can choose your favorite module and run only those, or
only those tagged P1. You can abandon the tests and come back later to
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 15:15 +0100, Sophie wrote:
This is a gentle reminder that the pad for the annual report is waiting
What is the deadline ? :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@collabora.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
--
To unsubscribe e-mail
Hi Michael,
Le 20/12/2013 16:09, Michael Meeks a écrit :
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 15:15 +0100, Sophie wrote:
This is a gentle reminder that the pad for the annual report is waiting
What is the deadline ? :-)
Florian will correct me, but if I remember well, he had to send it in
April
Hello,
Sophie wrote on 2013-12-20 16:34:
Florian will correct me, but if I remember well, he had to send it in
April this year, so lets say end of February for the hard dead line, so
he has time to write and translate it without pressure :) And it gives
time for us also to present nicely our
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Mac OS X 10.9. Getting error message when attempting to start (open)
the app after installing: LibreOffice.app is damaged and can't be
opened. You should move it to the trash.
This problem also occured with the Beta2, and
2013/12/20 Christian Lohmaier lohma...@googlemail.com
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the first release
candidate of LibreOffice 4.2.0. The upcoming 4.2.0 will bring new
features and lots of bugfixes. Check out
Hi Christian,
I used the regular (32-bit) build, which the download page suggested,
and which I have always used. Should I be using the 64-bit build? I'll
try that today.
--Jean
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Christian Lohmaier
lohma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Jean,
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Christian,
I used the regular (32-bit) build, which the download page suggested,
and which I have always used. Should I be using the 64-bit build? I'll
try that today.
both should work for 10.9... I would just like a
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Christian,
I used the regular (32-bit) build, which the download page suggested,
and which I have always used. Should I be using the 64-bit
