On 24 Apr 01:14, Bjoern Rabenstein wrote:
> On 23.04.20 13:40, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> >
> > Should the maintainers (Ben & Fish) be allowed to release without
> > waiting for the audit to finish?
>
> If that's their wish, yes, sure.
>
> Under the described circumstances, I don't see a reason
On 23.04.20 13:40, Richard Hartmann wrote:
>
> Should the maintainers (Ben & Fish) be allowed to release without
> waiting for the audit to finish?
If that's their wish, yes, sure.
Under the described circumstances, I don't see a reason to block them.
--
Björn Rabenstein
[PGP-ID]
On 22.04.20 14:04, 'Chris Taylor' via Prometheus Developers wrote:
>
> Currently, my code uses prometheus.Register(), and checks whether the returned
> error is
> a prometheus.AlreadyRegisteredError to get access to the previously-registered
> metric and
> uses that instead.
>
> It'd be easy
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 21:08, Chris Taylor <
christopher.tay...@soundcloud.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 10:46, Brian Brazil <
> brian.bra...@robustperception.io> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 22:04, 'Chris Taylor' via Prometheus Developers <
>>
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 10:46, Brian Brazil
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 22:04, 'Chris Taylor' via Prometheus Developers <
> prometheus-developers@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Prometheans,
>>
>> posting this here because the Github issue template suggested discussing
>> changes on the
>>
Yes to release now
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, 5:11 PM Richard Hartmann
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> This is a call for consensus within Prometheus-team on releasing
> node_exporter 1.0.0 as-is.
>
> node_exporter 1.0.0-rc.0 has been cut on 2020-02-20[1]. It features
> experimental TLS support[2]. We are
Yes to release now.
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 17:12, Chris Marchbanks
wrote:
> Yes to releasing now.
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 13:40, Richard Hartmann <
> richih.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all, This is a call for consensus within Prometheus-team on releasing
> node_exporter 1.0.0
Yes to releasing now.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 13:40, Richard Hartmann
wrote:
Dear all,
This is a call for consensus within Prometheus-team on releasing
node_exporter 1.0.0 as-is.
node_exporter 1.0.0-rc.0 has been cut on 2020-02-20[1]. It features
experimental TLS support[2]. We are planning
Yes to release 1.0.0 as is. Lets not block on the security review.
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 at 12:41:10 PM UTC+1, Richard Hartmann wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> This is a call for consensus within Prometheus-team on releasing
> node_exporter 1.0.0 as-is.
>
> node_exporter 1.0.0-rc.0 has been cut
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:43 PM Brian Brazil
wrote:
> Let's be careful here with the word experimental, as that means something
> very specific in Prometheus terms. "experimental" means that we can make
> breaking changes to the API across versions, but doesn't say anything about
> how
On 23 Apr 13:40, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> This is a call for consensus within Prometheus-team on releasing
> node_exporter 1.0.0 as-is.
>
> node_exporter 1.0.0-rc.0 has been cut on 2020-02-20[1]. It features
> experimental TLS support[2]. We are planning to use this TLS support
>
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 12:53, Matthias Rampke
wrote:
> I agree, if we plan on releasing 1.0, have an RC, a security review for a
> feature marked experimental doesn't need to hold things up. We should make
> it clear when we consider TLS "ready for serious use" but that's for
> another release.
Agreed as well under these circumstances.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:53 PM Matthias Rampke
wrote:
> I agree, if we plan on releasing 1.0, have an RC, a security review for a
> feature marked experimental doesn't need to hold things up. We should make
> it clear when we consider TLS "ready for
I agree, if we plan on releasing 1.0, have an RC, a security review for a
feature marked experimental doesn't need to hold things up. We should make
it clear when we consider TLS "ready for serious use" but that's for
another release.
/MR
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:47 AM Richard Hartmann <
Yes
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:40 PM Richard Hartmann
wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> This is a call for consensus within Prometheus-team on releasing
> node_exporter 1.0.0 as-is.
>
> node_exporter 1.0.0-rc.0 has been cut on 2020-02-20[1]. It features
> experimental TLS support[2]. We are planning to
Yes, let's release right away.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:41 PM Richard Hartmann <
richih.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> This is a call for consensus within Prometheus-team on releasing
> node_exporter 1.0.0 as-is.
>
> node_exporter 1.0.0-rc.0 has been cut on 2020-02-20[1]. It
Dear all,
This is a call for consensus within Prometheus-team on releasing
node_exporter 1.0.0 as-is.
node_exporter 1.0.0-rc.0 has been cut on 2020-02-20[1]. It features
experimental TLS support[2]. We are planning to use this TLS support
as a template for all other exporters within and outside
Hi Sudhakar,
This is the development mailing list for Prometheus - questions about usage
are better asked (and you'll get better replies) on the Prometheus users
mailing list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/prometheus-users (see
also https://prometheus.io/community/).
Cheers,
Julius
On
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 22:04, 'Chris Taylor' via Prometheus Developers <
prometheus-developers@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Dear Prometheans,
>
> posting this here because the Github issue template suggested discussing
> changes on the
> mailing list first.
>
> I just discovered the
I'm new to Prometheus and have gone through the documentation not clear on
couple of things related to collecting metrics:
1. How do I scrape metrics from Splunk logs?
Context: All application logs are sent to Splunk. You have the visibility
of how the application is functioning based on the
https://youtu.be/cYjF4zTJxP4
Check it out and let me know
On Sat 18 Apr, 2020, 1:40 PM Julius Volz, wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 5:46 PM 'Diana Payton' via Prometheus Developers <
> prometheus-developers@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> Question is, does someone feel called upon (and
https://youtu.be/cYjF4zTJxP4
Check it out and let me know
On Thu 23 Apr, 2020, 2:34 AM 'Chris Taylor' via Prometheus Developers, <
prometheus-developers@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Dear Prometheans,
>
> posting this here because the Github issue template suggested discussing
> changes on the
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
