Re: [PG-devel] Reboot: Release of PG 4.2

2012-10-17 Thread David Aspinall

Hi Hendrik

Thanks for the nudge --- no blockers I don't think, except extreme 
overwork, 8-).   I'll try to push the button soon, just need a spare 
hour to run checks and update all the pieces.  Apologies for the delay.


 - David

On 17/10/12 15:25, Hendrik Tews wrote:

Hi,

David, is there anything left to do before you can do make
release? Maybe I or somebody else could help?

(My Coq project is now so large that the sequential blocking
compilation really sucks. I would really like to start now with
rewriting the compilation with parallel background jobs.)

Bye,

Hendrik
___
ProofGeneral-devel mailing list
ProofGeneral-devel@inf.ed.ac.uk
http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/proofgeneral-devel



___
ProofGeneral-devel mailing list
ProofGeneral-devel@inf.ed.ac.uk
http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/proofgeneral-devel

--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.



Re: [PG-devel] Reboot: Release of PG 4.2

2012-09-12 Thread Hendrik Tews
Hendrik Tews t...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de writes:

   - support for braces and bullets

This requires more work than I thought. I have to postpone this
to October. Given that only few people use braces/bullets
(because they are new) and even fewer use Prooftree, it doesn't
make sense to delay the release of Proof General because of this
issue.

The problem is that with braces and bullets Coq exhibits a state
where the old current goal has been finished but it has not yet
switched to the next goal. Without braces and bullets you never
see such a state and therefore all prooftree code assumes that
such a state is not visible.


Bye,

Hendrik
___
ProofGeneral-devel mailing list
ProofGeneral-devel@inf.ed.ac.uk
http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/proofgeneral-devel


Re: [PG-devel] Reboot: Release of PG 4.2

2012-09-04 Thread Stefan Monnier
 (add-hook 'proof-activate-scripting-hook '(lambda () (when

As mentioned recently, the above (lambda ...) s-expressions is not data
but is a function, so don't quote it with '.


Stefan


PS: As Elisp slowly moves to lexical scoping, the difference between the
two is becoming more important, hence my renewed battle against
such quoting.
___
ProofGeneral-devel mailing list
ProofGeneral-devel@inf.ed.ac.uk
http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/proofgeneral-devel