On 16/07/11 16:02, Rob Arthan wrote:
On 15 Jul 2011, at 15:29, Phil Clayton wrote:
I was going to leave this issue for now but I bumped into it again
today, so I've had a look into it. (It's not something that is holding
me up, just forcing me to put in parentheses where I don't want to!)
This
Phil,
On 15 Jul 2011, at 15:29, Phil Clayton wrote:
> I was going to leave this issue for now but I bumped into it again today, so
> I've had a look into it. (It's not something that is holding me up, just
> forcing me to put in parentheses where I don't want to!)
>
> This issue was originall
I was going to leave this issue for now but I bumped into it again
today, so I've had a look into it. (It's not something that is holding
me up, just forcing me to put in parentheses where I don't want to!)
This issue was originally noticed because the following term prints back
without paren
