Re: [ProofPower] Z Schemas - Help with Initialization and Precondition calculus

2009-03-24 Thread Roger Bishop Jones
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 05:07:09 Artur Oliveira Gomes wrote: >I'm having hard times to achieve some proofs of preciondition >and initialization using ProofPower. >The file attached contains 3 examples that I still can not prove. >If anyone could help me out with those proofs, I will be thankful.

Re: [ProofPower] Z Schemas - Help with Initialization and Precondition calculus

2009-03-24 Thread Artur Oliveira Gomes
Roger, In the case of an existential with a schema as the > signature the witness will usually be a binding > display. So for each of your proofs you must > come up with the binding display of a witness > for your conjecture, i.e. a binding which satisfies > the body of the existential, and then

Re: [ProofPower] Z Schemas - Help with Initialization and Precondition calculus

2009-03-24 Thread Roger Bishop Jones
Artur, On Tuesday 24 March 2009 10:35:51 Artur Oliveira Gomes wrote: >The problem is: only for those cases, >what I choose as witness does not satisfy the predicate. Well, any sequence of length 1 (or zero?) does for the first case. Proof attached. If you still can't crack the other two send me

Re: [ProofPower] Z Schemas - Help with Initialization and Precondition calculus

2009-03-24 Thread Artur Oliveira Gomes
Roger, When I execute: a (REPEAT z_strip_tac THEN POP_ASM_T ante_tac THEN asm_rewrite_tac[]); ProofPower returns the following message: :# :# Exception- Fail * the assumption list is empty [POP_ASM_T.9302] * raised Exception+ Fail * the assumption list is empty [POP_ASM_T.9302]