I have found denormalized terms popping up rather more than I would hope and causing me problems. I have found them occurring in two ways:
1. ML quotations nested in Z terms; 2. when avoiding variable capture, primarily z_%forall%_elim etc. The attached script gives an account of these issues.
Is the intention that Z proof operations always produce (valid) Z terms? PhilP.S. I have noticed that inst [] [] is not an identity operation, which may be related to item 1 above.
denormalized_z_egs.sml.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
_______________________________________________ Proofpower mailing list Proofpower@lemma-one.com http://lemma-one.com/mailman/listinfo/proofpower_lemma-one.com