On Fri, 20 Mar 2015, at 07:02 PM, Victor Seva wrote: > Great. I'm was working on that already so maybe we can share ideas. Be > aware that this work was done several months ago for 0.9.4 and I had > to stop working on this due to work load.
Sure! I haven't had time to read your code yet, but I will very soon. Thanks for mentioning it! >> I'm expecting s2s to be covered by a par of Prosody instances that >> accept stanzas and pass them to the right shard. I should be able to >> run multiple of those because they're basically stateless. > > But did you try that? No, not yet, but it seems to make sense. Do you anticipate a problem with that approach? > My approach was to extend mod_s2s as mod_s2sc to connect the nodes: So you're doing s2s/dialback between nodes? That will work I suppose, but in my case would be unnecessary overhead (not a lot of overhead, but still). Do you do outbound s2s from the cluster nodes, or push that through a central s2s node? I'm thinking I'll have inbound through a central node, but outbound directly from the shards - much easier to manage. > So I think we are trying to do the same thing. I have to point that I > didn't finish to polish this and for sure it could not work as it is > right now. But you can get the idea. Of course. I'll have a good read of your code as soon as I possibly can. Thanks again! Cheers, Rob N. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "prosody-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to prosody-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to prosody-dev@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prosody-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
