That's because the system resources that are monitored are not related to
the total memory that you have. It measures the amount of system table area
that is remaining. And that is a fixed and very small size by today's
software requirements. I think it totals to 64K, the amount addressable by
Micky,
I assume you are monitoring your User and GDI stack resources with this
system monitor? Or what are you referring to? Is that a CPU usage graph?
Got my curiosity up,
Frank
At 09:38 AM 2/8/01 -0600, you wrote:
Kind of cool?
I have been curious about the system performance while
Are you saying the graphs are not a true indication of the system
performance?
I wouldn't expect Windows to do something that wasn't real! LOL!!
-Original Message-
From: TSListServer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Tim Hutcheson
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:16 AM
To:
No, he wasn't saying that The Resource monitor monitors system
resources, which, as others have mentioned, are a bit cramped in Windows
98SE no matter how much total memory you have.
At 10:49 AM 2/8/01 -0600, Micky Blain wrote:
Are you saying the graphs are not a true indication of the
