In a recent discussion on re-annotation a regular poster to this forum was
skeptical that the synchronizer would cope with large scale changes to
designators, including resetting and then re-running the Sch annotation
process. This shows signs of old-style netlist thinking where one had to
On 11:53 AM 16/07/2001 +0100, Andrew Ircha said:
..Snip..
You're close but not quite there. I was making modification in one
library, hiting UpdatePCB (which presents as a button in the explorer
panel), and instead of putting my new, freshly changed footprint into
the open PCBs, it was taking a
thanks Brad
so i take it you think it is worth it?
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Dennis,
the initial cost for the software based version is $595USD for a
three user license (they don't have a single user license). The book version
is now a single CDROM and it is priced at
Dennis,
yes I think it is worth it. I have used the SMT+ system for approx.
7 years. Formerly I was sitting and doing the calculations by hand based
upon their methods. Sometimes this was painful to calculate all the pad
sizes and then the precise pad centers. This was before my present
Just to jump in in defense of Maxim...I use a lot of their power supply and
communication related parts (MAX724, MAX1480, MAX1490, MAX488 etc...) and
they have been very good with samples and lead times through Maxim direct
sales even for small volumes ( less than 50 pieces sometimes..)
Maybe
their parts are good
but I have not had your experience with availability
Dennis Saputelli
Madhu Annapragada wrote:
Just to jump in in defense of Maxim...I use a lot of their power supply and
communication related parts (MAX724, MAX1480, MAX1490, MAX488 etc...) and
they have been very good
sounds better than RelCalc from www.t-cubed.com which I used at my previous employer.
Cheers!
Drew
- Original Message -
From: Brendon Slade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] MTBF Software
Not wanting to