Re: [PEDA] copies don't update
-Original Message-
From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am happy to
post them but I suspect that some people may get uppity for some
reason. If a few people are interested in comparison between
DXP and P99SE
I will pass comment, otherwise I will do it much more rarely.
I think it's interesting
Right now, DXP doesn't seem to offer me much more than what 99SE can do
anyway, so I guess it would be fun to see what I'm missing at least...
Maybe if you start a convention where you flag the header with {compare} or
{DXP/99SE} or something, those people who don't like it can delete the
messages unread.
Julian
--
Julian Higginson - Design Engineer - Lake Technology.
Suite 502/55 Mountain St, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
Phone: +61 2 9213 9000 - Direct: +61 2 9213 9021
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.lake.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
[PEDA] Polygon ground question
Dear sir: In placing polygonground,there always exist some tiny polygon, these tinytrace will interfer signal trace. I have 2 methods to deal with this: 1: dobule click the polygon plane, unlock primitive ,then modify the tiny traces. The shortcoming is: If I need rebuild the polygon, I have to modify again. 2: In relative layer(eg TOP layer),route an trace( no net) to keep from the tiny trace,let the tract' s properties is keepout, then rebuid the polygon, it will no tiny trace. The shortcoming is: After fulfil these work, I have to delete these"keepout" trace, but maybe I need rebild the polygon. So I still havn't thought good method to do it. Can you give me any guide? Best regards, Miao yijun Phone:(86)25-2262313 EXT 438 Fax: (86)25-2267474 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PEDA] copies don't update
Ian, Let me get this straight. So what you are saying here is that there really is no proper update footprint?? (reason Protel does not understand the word update) By that I mean if I have a library of footprints then change say 10 of them. These 10 were used in a design. I now would like to be able to update the footprints in the board with the latest that are in the library with the use of and update footprint command. In DXP there is still no way to do that in one update step??? Bob Wolfe - Original Message - From: Ian Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [PEDA] copies don't update On 12:53 AM 28/05/2003, Dennis Saputelli said: let's not be overly sensitive or politically correct of course we want to hear about DXP comparisions Dennis Saputelli [DXP comment] As well as the existing Update Schematics function (in SchLib editor), DXP Sch now allows you to pull changes from a Sch library - you get a dialog allowing you to control which components are updated, and to control what attributes are updated. It is more controlled than the P99SE push method of updating. The P99SE method is still there - in DXP it will tell you the number of changed components and the number of affected documents - not very controlled but useful as a check. This update from library exists in Sch - it is not implemented in PCB, there is still no easy way to force PCB footprints to be updated from the PCBLib, which is a shame - especially as it is now possible to controlled much more precisely where a footprint should be sourced, so controlled updates are possible. Ian * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Re: [PEDA] copies don't update
Hi,
That would be interesting, like me who have to convince my boss as to why we
should migrate to DXP.
Thanks Julian, you have made my view come to light.
jeyaraman
- Original Message -
From: Julian Higginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Protel EDA Forum' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] copies don't update
-Original Message-
From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am happy to
post them but I suspect that some people may get uppity for some
reason. If a few people are interested in comparison between
DXP and P99SE
I will pass comment, otherwise I will do it much more rarely.
I think it's interesting
Right now, DXP doesn't seem to offer me much more than what 99SE can do
anyway, so I guess it would be fun to see what I'm missing at least...
Maybe if you start a convention where you flag the header with {compare}
or
{DXP/99SE} or something, those people who don't like it can delete the
messages unread.
Julian
--
Julian Higginson - Design Engineer - Lake Technology.
Suite 502/55 Mountain St, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
Phone: +61 2 9213 9000 - Direct: +61 2 9213 9021
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.lake.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Re: [PEDA] copies don't update
At 28/05/2003 03:03, Julian wrote:
I think it's interesting
snip_snip
Maybe if you start a convention where you flag the header with {compare} or
{DXP/99SE} or something, those people who don't like it can delete the
messages unread.
Good idea! Even for the folks who _are_ interested (like me)
Leo
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Re: [PEDA] Polygon ground question
In placing polygon ground, there always exist some tiny polygon, these tiny trace will interfer signal trace. When placing or editing the polygon plane, click on the Remove dead copper box. This will clear all unconnected copper bits Ian Rozowsky RD Director Centurion Systems (Pty) Ltd. Box 506 Cramerview 2060 South Africa [EMAIL PROTECTED] ||Anti-spam - please remove the ** from the e-mail address before sending|| http://www.centsys.co.za * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
