Hi Steve,
I just tried your tip on a board I'm working on, and it crashed DXP and
99SE! I experimented a bit, and it seems like if can draw one huge line
somewhere in the polygon, it's ok. If it can't draw anything, an AV occurs
in ADVPCB.DLL. I can close the AV and then do an orderly shutdown of
I just normally add an extra temporary layer (or layers), double click on
the polygons and edit them onto the temporary layer.
Do all your editting etc then move the polyons back onto your working
layers.
Remember to delete the temporary layers when finished.
-Original Message-
From:
Sorry to say, it made PCB editing sluggish, followed by a crash (99SE win2k,
RADEON 9000 dual 1600x1200, 1gb mem, 2.6ghz Athalon).
Mike Ingle
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Getting a polygone
Hi Tony,
In poured polygons the best solution is to just turn off the fill, this will allow you
to move and add entities a lot easier, it also solves a bigger problem when you have
multiple polygons and every time you move something you won't get (analyzing net) that
takes forever. Simply turn
ha, ha, ha! how about Don't eXpect Productivity?
DXP seems more like an 80's DOS program like Wordstar than a modern Windows
application, the ctrl-alt-keyclicks are not even consistant between
PCB-schematic-and CamTastic
From: Bob Cochran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL
In all fairness, the consistency of keystrokes and general user interface
features is one *Hell* of a lot better in DXP than it was in previous
versions of Protel.
-Original Message-
From: Protel Hell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wrote an extensive response in this thread last week, and it seems to
have disappeared. Last week I started to get back a few Mailer Daemon error
messages that the domain techservinc.com could not be reached. But some
messages did get through and in this case I got no error message We'll
What in the world are you talking about? I didn't lash out. I said:
Is that really necessary? Or productive?
Mr. Tian, it stand for Design Explorer, (maybe such as: Design eXPlorer),
but why is that a problem you suddenly met?
The first sentence was obviously aimed at Bob's comments, because I
I wrote in another thread:
At 02:11 PM 12/15/2003, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I wrote an extensive response in this thread last week, and it seems to
have disappeared. Last week I started to get back a few Mailer Daemon
error messages that the domain techservinc.com could not be reached. But
At 12:12 PM 12/15/2003, Protel Hell wrote:
ha, ha, ha! how about Don't eXpect Productivity?
DXP seems more like an 80's DOS program like Wordstar than a modern
Windows application, the ctrl-alt-keyclicks are not even consistant
between PCB-schematic-and CamTastic
This is not at all surprising.
It occurs to me that something I wrote was less than clear.
At 05:33 PM 12/15/2003, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I've been starting to use DXP, and my first impressions are
(1) DXP has some very nice features
(2) As others have noted, there is a learning curve.
I wrote about the
11 matches
Mail list logo
