Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] FW: Access violation -- Is it a Protel bug?
On 02:40 PM 17/04/2002 -0700, Shuping Lew said:
I use some notes on every schematic project. So I created a schematic
symbol
named note for it. To avoid the warning of missing footprint, I also
created a footprint named blank
Thanks Dave,
One more thing, can you try creating a netlist and then try loading that
into a PCB using the Netlist Manager | Netlist Load command (as opposed to
using the Update PCB synchroniser). Does it crash? This would then
confirm Shuping's bug and the proposed bug database entry.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2002 13:01
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] FW: Access violation -- Is it a Protel bug?
Thanks Dave,
One more thing, can you try creating a netlist and then try loading that
into a PCB using the Netlist Manager | Netlist Load command (as opposed
At 03:23 PM 4/16/2002 -0700, Shuping Lew wrote:
I tried to load a netlist file to PCB. It has over 1,100 components. I
receiced a warning of access violation. It says: Access Violation at address
OF086CC6 module Exception Occurred in PCB: Netlist...
First of all, yes, I would strongly
Dear ABD,
First of all, yes, I would strongly suspect a bug, though a damaged
executable is a possible but unlikely culprit. Mr. Wilson is correct, it
should not be possible to cause an access violation with bad (or good)
netlist data.
One factor not stated so far: did the Schematic pass a
At 10:13 AM 4/17/2002 -0700, Shuping Lew wrote:
---I created netlist for each sheets. There are total 25 sheets. I then
loaded them individaully. There were no problem.
If the problem was, for example, that you had an incorrect scope such that
some net names were duplicated between sheets even
)
It should go to Protel for eval.
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Abd ulRahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] FW: Access violation -- Is it a Protel bug?
At 10:13 AM 4/17/2002 -0700, Shuping Lew
Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] FW: Access violation -- Is it a Protel bug?
At 10:13 AM 4/17/2002 -0700, Shuping Lew wrote:
---I created netlist for each sheets. There are total 25 sheets. I then
loaded them individaully. There were no problem.
If the problem was, for example, that you had an incorrect
Was it your motherboard? ;)
What hardware component did you delete
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Shuping Lew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:25 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] FW: Access violation -- Is it a Protel bug?
Thanks for all
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:07:39 -0700, Tony Karavidas wrote:
Was it your motherboard? ;)
What hardware component did you delete
Lew --
Yes, please elaborate. Telling us exactly what the problem was
and how you fixed it might help some other list member in the
future. It might also be seen by
At 02:40 PM 4/17/2002 -0700, Shuping Lew wrote:
I use some notes on every schematic project. So I created a schematic symbol
named note for it. To avoid the warning of missing footprint, I also
created a footprint named blank to associate with that symbol.
I think there is a better way. You can
Thank you. ABD. I like the idea.
Shuping
-Original Message-
From: Abd ulRahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:21 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] FW: Access violation -- Is it a Protel bug?
At 02:40 PM 4/17/2002 -0700, Shuping Lew wrote
: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] FW: Access violation -- Is it a Protel bug?
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:07:39 -0700, Tony Karavidas wrote:
Was it your motherboard? ;)
What hardware component did you delete
Lew --
Yes, please elaborate. Telling us exactly
Ian Wilson's questions are good ones. Did you enter the schematic and
generate the Netlist? If you entered the schematic, and if it is an option,
I would begin by resetting all Identifiers to ?. That is, do a global change
of all R's to R?, all C's to C?, etc, for all components. Then use Tools/
15 matches
Mail list logo
