On 10:10 AM 6/03/2001 +1100, John Haddy said:
By definition, 1 inch = 25.4mm exactly. This was standardised
some decades ago.
It's when rounded numbers are used that problems occur.
Cheers,
John Haddy
Off topic a little...
But the metre (and hence inch) are derived quantities (variables) so
Well, when we get to 1000+ pin per side PQFPs, I'll start
worrying - but then again, I'm sure my assembler will be
worrying more!
John Haddy
P.S. It's a bit windy for the beach today - and 25C is too cool.
-Original Message-
From: TSListServer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of
Ian Wilson wrote:
On 10:10 AM 6/03/2001 +1100, John Haddy said:
By definition, 1 inch = 25.4mm exactly. This was standardised
some decades ago.
Off topic a little...
But the metre (and hence inch) are derived quantities (variables) so all
our footprints are totally useless! Do you hear
From: Douglas Jensen
Sorry - my Metrology brain kicked in - and since we are having so much fun,
I decided to chime in with the definitive answer on two definitions: The
Meter and The Second. I don't claim to know all this stuff, but I do know
where to find it:
Big chuckle..
I don't know when the meter was last revised, but hey the beach does sound pretty
darn good.
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 4:30 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list proteledausers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jon Elson wrote:
Ian Wilson wrote:
On 10:10 AM 6/03/2001 +1100, John Haddy said:
By definition, 1 inch = 25.4mm exactly. This was standardised
some decades ago.
Off topic a little...
But the metre (and hence inch) are derived quantities (variables) so all
our footprints are
Dear All,
I have found this thread interesting and frequently amusing, but
could we please take it elsewhere now as it does not relate directly to issues with
Protel.
Regards,
Rob Malos,
Cyborg Design.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This
