Ahhh..., thanks John
Roger
At 06:38 PM 16-07-04, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: RogerHead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2004 03:45
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Ver 3.x -- 99SE or DXP??
Hi John,
You said
In some ways it is actually functionally better
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:22:08 -0700, Brooks,Bill wrote:
We need to gather a bunch of programmers and designers together and
beat
this one out... after a few brews and a couple of black eyes, we might
actually be able to get what the industry really needs.
Bill,
I honestly think there's two
to be Niemann-Marcus,
but most designers only need Walmart.
Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: Matt Pobursky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Ver 3.x -- 99SE
-Original Message-
From: RogerHead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2004 03:45
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Ver 3.x -- 99SE or DXP??
Hi John,
You said
In some ways it is actually functionally better but I prefer
to view it
without all the WinXP
% you will have problems.
Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: Tom Luttrell PWRCOM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Ver 3.x -- 99SE or DXP??
I
http://pcbwizards.com
-Original Message-
From: RogerHead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 5:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEDA] Ver 3.x -- 99SE or DXP??
I've used Protel since the V1.1 days. We stopped upgrading after buying a
couple of licenses for 3.x
I've used Protel since the V1.1 days. We stopped upgrading after buying a
couple of licenses for 3.x, mainly because it does about 99% of our needs.
I've had cursory looks at other versions as they came out, but nothing
really grabbed me. Now I'm looking hard (using a trial cd with SP2), but I
I have no experience with DXP but I can recommend the move from v3 to
99se.
I have found 99se +sp6 running on win 2k is extremely stable and the db
system is very useful to us. Conversely I had no end of trouble with v3.
Most of our boards are double or 4 layer at most and easily manually
-Original Message-
From: RogerHead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 1:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEDA] Ver 3.x -- 99SE or DXP??
I've used Protel since the V1.1 days. We stopped upgrading
after buying a couple of licenses for 3.x, mainly because
R Am I missing something?? I certainly don't want 'integrated tools'. I'll
R always use the manufacturer's tools for CPLD/FPGA/..., because I believe
R that they will be more up-to-date, and with less 'gotchas than when a
R third party tries to shoehorn it into their own product. Again I might
Hi John,
You said
In some ways it is actually functionally better but I prefer to view it
without all the WinXP
finishing touches which makes it look worse than it is.
Is there a 'classic' setting somewhere?
The library panel really irritates me. It could be so much better.
Regards,
Roger
* *
Hi Phillip,
Could you just elaborate a little on
The automatic generation of the *entire* FPGA's schematic sheet,
drawing all the wires, assigning nets to the wires, creating
the off sheet ports, creating the pin constraints file, and the FPGA pin
assignments can be passed
12 matches
Mail list logo
