Re: [PEDA] Altera 144Pin TQFP Landing Pattern

2001-09-06 Thread Michael Schmitt
No Problem, i can send it to you, we use this device so the footprint is very well tested :-) If you want contact me. Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Michael Schmitt Baumer Ident GmbH Entwicklung / Development Department Hertzstr. 10 D-69469 Weinheim Deutschland / Germany Tel. +49 (0) 6201 9957 - 30 Fax. +49

[PEDA] unsubscribe

2001-09-06 Thread Stan Boler
unsubscribe * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: *

Re: [PEDA] Diode pads

2001-09-06 Thread Ian Wilson
On 03:57 PM 5/09/2001 -0700, Brad Velander said: Abd ul-Rahman, My point was only that the EBC, AK, GDS is redundant and stupid on the schematic because the symbols convey the function of each pin already. Holding only the printed schematic in your hand, the EBC, GDS and AK conveys what

Re: [PEDA] Diode pads

2001-09-06 Thread Brian Guralnick
- Original Message - From: Ian Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:26 AM Subject: Re: [PEDA] Diode pads | | Years ago I saw many mistakes made with 123-style numbering, many of these | were repeat mistakes. I forced a

Re: [PEDA] Diode pads

2001-09-06 Thread HxEngr

[PEDA] How to find spice and simcode models?

2001-09-06 Thread Yuri Potapoff
Dear Sirs, My customer needs models for simulation in Protel next ICs. SN74LS279, SN74LS123, SN74ALS1008A, SN74ALS1032A, SN74ALS368, SN74ALS1034, SN74ALS1035, SN74LS55, SN74LS51, SN74LS54, SN74ALS114A, SN74LS279, SN74ALS1000, SN74ALS1020, SN74ALS1003, SN74ALS1010, SN74ALS1002, SN74ALS1011,

[PEDA] Removal From List

2001-09-06 Thread Jim McGrath
Hi All, Has Anyone else received this messege? Last time I got this messege it was not my problem. I do NOT want to be removed from this list! I received 20 messeges this morning and others since then. Regards, Jim McGrath CAD Connections, Inc. RESET-ERROR proteledaforum [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PEDA] Removal From List

2001-09-06 Thread Gaetan Fournier
Same thing for me, I have check with our system administrator he didn't find any problem with my Email address. GF -Original Message- From: Jim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:45 PM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: [PEDA] Removal From List Hi All,

[PEDA] VBA Scripts

2001-09-06 Thread Richard Thompson
Hi Group I have written a simple VBA Script within Excel that basically reformats a BOM from protel, using pivot tables etc. Is there a way i can either; a: import the script into Protel and execute it to give me a nice new BOM from within protel, therefore never

Re: [PEDA] Removal From List

2001-09-06 Thread Michael Schmitt
I have received that too and our admin told me that there is no MX-Entry included in the mails from this list, so our mailserver can not solve the ip-adress and gives up after a while. now this repeats and loops it is definitly an error from the mailing list server. Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Michael

Re: [PEDA] Removal From List

2001-09-06 Thread Buckley.Dave
Jim, I had one today. Our IT dept say it's not them. Dave Buckley -Original Message- From: Jim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 September 2001 18:45 To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: [PEDA] Removal From List Hi All, Has Anyone else received this messege? Last time I got this

Re: [PEDA] Removal From List

2001-09-06 Thread Walter Muth
Hi Jim same message here Walter Muth RBW Elektronik GmbH Jim McGrath wrote: Hi All, Has Anyone else received this messege? Last time I got this messege it was not my problem. I do NOT want to be removed from this list! I received 20 messeges this morning and others since then.

Re: [PEDA] Diode pads

2001-09-06 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support
My point was only that the EBC, AK, GDS is redundant and stupid on the schematic because the symbols convey the function of each pin already. Holding only the printed schematic in your hand, the EBC, GDS and AK conveys what information that you didn't already know from the symbol? What does

[PEDA] Drag 'n Drop Copy Bug in Design Explorer

2001-09-06 Thread Frank Gilley
Surely I'm not the only one annoyed by this (often) and I just wanted to make sure that a note had been made of it... forgive me for repeating if this has been covered a dozen times before. When using drag 'n drop to copy (holding down ctrl) a folder containing files to another folder within

Re: [PEDA] Removal From List

2001-09-06 Thread Ted Tontis
I just received the same message. This is the second time I received it this year. I brought this to the attention of the group when I first received it about 6/7 months ago. Our IT guy says it is because tech serv is trying to route through our server. Our e-mail server is set not to allow

Re: [PEDA] Diode pads

2001-09-06 Thread Brad Velander
Guys, guys, guys ... gals, cease fire! Some people seem to have taken my original comments completely out of context. I did not say that using the EBC/GDS type of pin labeling is stupid or redundant. My statement was only that displaying those labels on the schematic was

Re: [PEDA] Diode pads

2001-09-06 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 03:57 PM 9/5/01 -0700, Brad Velander wrote: If you receive information as a netlist only, then the customer is responsible anyways right? They have to have used the right symbol with the right part. If they didn't how can you possibly tell? Ah, but the client is always right unless

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Richard Barsczewski
Yes they are. -Original Message- From: Ted Tontis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:33 PM To: Protel Forum (E-mail) Subject: [PEDA] test could someone let me know if my messages are getting out? Thank you, Ted Tontis C.I.D. Engage Networks 316

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Steve Smith
Yes Steve Smith -Original Message- From: Ted Tontis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:33 PM To: Protel Forum (E-mail) Subject: [PEDA] test could someone let me know if my messages are getting out? Thank you, Ted Tontis C.I.D. Engage

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread HxEngr

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Roger McLain
I read you 10 by 10. -Original Message- From: Ted Tontis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:33 PM To: Protel Forum (E-mail) Subject: [PEDA] test could someone let me know if my messages are getting out? Thank you, Ted Tontis C.I.D. Engage Networks 316 N.

[PEDA] removed from list

2001-09-06 Thread Ted Tontis
Seems as though I had an e-mail bounced from the techserv. Did anyone receive the e-mail I sent in response to the removed from proteledaforum? Thank you, Ted Tontis C.I.D. Engage Networks 316 N. Milwaukee Street Suite 214 Milwaukee WI, 53202 PH 414-273-7600 ext. 7607 FX 414-273-7601 * * * * *

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Ted Tontis
Below is the first message I had bounced. I rest my error count I don't know if that had anything to do with it. Ted I just received the same message. This is the second time I received it this year. I brought this to the attention of the group when I first received it about 6/7 months ago.

Re: [PEDA] Bug List - better implementation desired

2001-09-06 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 09:10 AM 9/6/01 +1000, Ian Wilson wrote: I am searching (part time) for a better method of maintaining the bug list. I am thinking something along the lines of the Bugzilla project as used by the Mozilla people (http://www.mozilla.org/bugs/). Or something similar. What I would like is:

[PEDA] Protel Client Basic is not Y2K compliant.

2001-09-06 Thread Brian Guralnick
I was just reading through ClientBasic Help came across this: - Syntax: Year(DateVar$) Description: Returns an integer between 1980 and 1999, inclusive, that represents the year given in DateVar$. Parameters: DateVar$ - a string expression that can be resolved

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Jim McGrath
Hi All, At the risk of being cut from this very Important list I recieved this messege from the forum Administrator (a warning to you all): Subject: Off Topic Discussions Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 10:01:02 -0700 From: Forum Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

[PEDA] PCB Design Conference East

2001-09-06 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
I'm just letting the list know that I'll be at the Protel Users meeting sponsored by Altium at the conference next week. See you there! Abd ulRahman Lomax Chair, Protel Users Association * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:48 PM 9/6/01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, this one got out to me. But I just got one of the bounce messages that I've seen from several users today. It seems TechServ has a problem at their end. Sure would hate to get unsubscribed - this list has been a lifeline at times. Since

Re: [PEDA] Printing bug Alert

2001-09-06 Thread HxEngr

Re: [PEDA] Altera 144Pin TQFP Landing Pattern

2001-09-06 Thread Jon Elson
Michael Schmitt wrote: No Problem, i can send it to you, we use this device so the footprint is very well tested :-) But, watch out for pin 1 orinetation. I just had to redo a board, because I forgot to check that. Some chips have pin 1 in the middle of a side, some at a corner. Some

Re: [PEDA] Removal From List

2001-09-06 Thread Jon Elson
Jim McGrath wrote: Hi All, Has Anyone else received this messege? Last time I got this messege it was not my problem. I do NOT want to be removed from this list! I received 20 messeges this morning and others since then. Techserv's Internet Service Provider apparently had a link outage

Re: [PEDA] Bug List - better implementation desired

2001-09-06 Thread Ian Wilson
On 02:17 PM 6/09/2001 -0700, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax said: At 09:10 AM 9/6/01 +1000, Ian Wilson wrote: I am searching (part time) for a better method of maintaining the bug list. I am thinking something along the lines of the Bugzilla project as used by the Mozilla people

Re: [PEDA] Diode pads

2001-09-06 Thread Jeff Stout
I really hesitate to follow up this thread because nobody is going to change anybody else's mind. The only reason I am responding is to give Brad a little support for his POV vs. the overwhelming decient. I too use 123 as opposed to EBC. I think it has three big advantages. 1. I only need one

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Ian Wilson
On 02:22 PM 6/09/2001 -0700, Jim McGrath said: Hi All, At the risk of being cut from this very Important list I recieved this messege from the forum Administrator (a warning to you all): You won't get cut from the list as if you did you would email a regular user direct and they would let

Re: [PEDA] test

2001-09-06 Thread Ian Wilson
On 02:30 PM 6/09/2001 -0400, Brian Guralnick said: My posts no longer echo back to me, is anyone receiving this? Brian Guralnick I seem to recall that this has happened before. I have a theory on what has happened but I don't think I will go into it. There is an option to turn

Re: [PEDA] Altera 144Pin TQFP Landing Pattern

2001-09-06 Thread MSIsallen

[PEDA] Panelise several designs

2001-09-06 Thread Kevin Blackmore
Hi I am currently trying to create an A3 panel of 10 PCB designs I have created using Protel99SE. This saves cost by prototyping several PCB boards at once. When I try to copy and paste the PCB designs using Protel99SE the designs lose their connections to the Internal Plane (which I am

Re: [PEDA] Panelise several designs

2001-09-06 Thread Geoff Harland
I am currently trying to create an A3 panel of 10 PCB designs I have created using Protel99SE. This saves cost by prototyping several PCB boards at once. When I try to copy and paste the PCB designs using Protel99SE the designs lose their connections to the Internal Plane (which I am using

Re: [PEDA] Panelise several designs

2001-09-06 Thread Ian Wilson
At 01:08 PM 7/09/01 +1200, you wrote: Hi I am currently trying to create an A3 panel of 10 PCB designs I have created using Protel99SE. This saves cost by prototyping several PCB boards at once. When I try to copy and paste the PCB designs using Protel99SE the designs lose their connections to