[PEDA] Translators

Re: [PEDA] Complex 2 Simple

ok Jeff Stout - Original Message - From: Tim Hutcheson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 6:40 PM Subject: Re: [PEDA] Complex 2 Simple HI, Jeff. I was a little vague because a lot depends on what you are doing. If you are

Re: [PEDA] to DXP or not to DXP

Unified libraries... I expect the list will go on... I must try out the new autorouter some time. I admit I have only tried the autorouter with minimal training with disastrous results but I thought that was probably my ignorance in setting it up properly. I then went to load the demo boards

Re: [PEDA] to DXP or not to DXP

i don't think i will be using DXP for quite sometime myself it looks like the learning curve is too steep for the rewards to be had i am mystified why they felt compelled to make such sweeping changes to a reasonably stable and useful product the unified library i think (not sure here) is

Re: [PEDA] to DXP or not to DXP

If this is the best that a trained Situs user can produce, I am not impressed at all. I wonder what the yields of these designs would be in a real production environment. Situs - sounds like Klytus, the evil henchman of Ming the Merciless in the Flash Gordon fiction. Well, I consider myself

Re: [PEDA] AW: Polygon Plane clearance and SMD PADs design rule set up for Protel 99 SE

Dear Waldemar, Thank you for your replied. I tried the first comment, it works. Thank you. I still have problem setting up SMD pads to polygon connection. Here is what I did: Design rule/manufacturing/polygon connect style, I tried to use Pad Specification as filter. There is no Object Type

Re: [PEDA] to DXP or not to DXP

Matt, Jason and Dennis, I saw a website called PROTTA. They are offering a newly developed Protel DXP 1-day Upgrade Course with information as to what the differences are and the advantages to upgrading from 99SE to DXP. I would like to know why hasn't anyone ever done this before? Why

[PEDA] Newbie questions

I have a chance to acquire a legit copy of 99SE in a rather major swap of test equipment and computer supplies with another company. It is a rather minor component of the whole deal, but before I trade for it, I want to make sure that it will do what I want it to do. As yet, perusing the

Re: [PEDA] DXP NOT MADE FOR WINDOWS NT

Is it still possible to migrate to Windows 2000 Pro without buying a used computer? I thought it wasn't being sold anymore. John Childers - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [PEDA] DXP

[PEDA] Netlist output to Protel from Orcad 9.1?

Re: [PEDA] DXP NOT MADE FOR WINDOWS NT

i just bought a new 'white box' w/ a fresh copy of win 2000 pro on it Dennis Saputelli John W. Childers wrote: Is it still possible to migrate to Windows 2000 Pro without buying a used computer? I thought it wasn't being sold anymore. John Childers - Original Message - From:

Re: [PEDA] Netlist output to Protel from Orcad 9.1?

Hi Joe, I have OrCad Lite 9.2 Lite installed on my system and that can output a netlist in Protel 2 format which seems to import fine in a Protel PCB. I selected the Protel 2 format by choosing the other tab in OrCad's Create netlist window and then selecting protel2.dll in the formatters

Re: [PEDA] DXP NOT MADE FOR WINDOWS NT

The MS license for XP allows you to run Win2000 instead - ie buy XP and run 2000 - that's okay! Till later, Scott. ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø Scott May. Hydrographic Support 1345 Ipswich Road Rocklea. Ph +61 7 3892 5610 Fax +61 7 3848 5191 Mob 0417 195 018

Re: [PEDA] to DXP or not to DXP

[PEDA] Sch libraries and parts lists (Ex:Newbie questions)

On 01:08 PM 20/08/2002 -0700, Jim Weir said: I have a chance to acquire a legit copy of 99SE in a rather major swap of test equipment and computer supplies with another company. It is a rather minor component of the whole deal, but before I trade for it, I want to make sure that it will do what

Re: [PEDA] Matched Lenghth Constraint

It's not yet implemented in DXP. That is something I specifically tested. -Original Message- From: Michael Reagan (EDSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 7:34 PM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] Matched Lenghth Constraint Clive, I was waiting

Re: [PEDA] CALS Compliant output

Hello, The IPC documents can be found at ipc.org The IGES description, I don't know where. regards, Phil. -Original Message- From: ElectronTrade (info) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 17 August 2002 03:45 To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] CALS Compliant output Hello,

[PEDA] AW2: Polygon Plane clearance and SMD PADs design rule set up for Protel 99 SE

Shuping, sorry, but I have no Idea to deal with that Problem. I tried the Settings you made on one of my desings with same result: it does not work. IMO a bug in Protel. There are two workarounds I see, both not realy handy. 1. design a PAD-class (design/classes/pads) for SMD-pads.