Ian,
Perhaps this thread was a waste of your time because of your familiarity of
DXP, but I found the information presented quite enlightening. Thank you
(and everybody else) for the time you put into your responses.
JM
At 07:49 PM 5/30/2004, you wrote:
On 10:30 AM 31/05/2004, John A. Ross
Jim Monroe wrote:
I am amazed that more than 2 years after DXP's debut its still lacking
in such a way. [Regarding global edits]
Jim, I am amazed that you are amazed. Step back and see what kind of
thinking went into making the change. Someone at a reasonably high
level decided (or was
In light of the recent thread on upgrading to DXP I would like to ask the question of
those who have (and possibly those that didn't) regarding sharing your files with us
Protel 99SE people i.e. Having done your DXP pcb/schematics you need to share them
with us 99SE users. How confident can
Hamid,
The reason I'm amazed is that I can't be the first to notice that FSO has
major shortcomings. Obviously Protel saw the need for it, so why have they
stopped short?
I'm not quite as cynical. It's apparent that DXP was the result of truly
integrating the various Protel products. A good
At 01:25 PM 5/29/2004, Terry Harris wrote:
Having just been offered a discount to upgrade from 99SE to 2004 it's time
to think about it again. (I knew those special offers would keep coming).
Is it fit to use yet or should hold out for a couple more service packs and
the next special offer?
Don't
Laurie,
As you probably know, DXP incorporates new features that didn't exist in
99se. So depending on the design and features used in the design, exporting
from DXP to 99se may take a little (or a lot) of rework once the file is
loaded in 99se.
This is always the downside of adding new
On 06:18 AM 1/06/2004, Jim Monroe said:
Hamid,
The reason I'm amazed is that I can't be the first to notice that FSO has
major shortcomings. Obviously Protel saw the need for it, so why have they
stopped short?
You are not the first to notice and others are trying to get changes in
On Mon, 31 May 2004 16:23:17 -0400, you wrote:
At 01:25 PM 5/29/2004, Terry Harris wrote:
Having just been offered a discount to upgrade from 99SE to 2004 it's time
to think about it again. (I knew those special offers would keep coming).
Is it fit to use yet or should hold out for a couple more
Thank You Mr Ross for providing that link. Any direct Protel affiliation would
support my previous accusations that Mr. Wilson could slightly be a little biased
by defending any position that Protel takes. It would be fair to say he also got
paid for it also. Hey Fellow's CAD users
Hi,
I am also considering the 99SE to 2004 upgrade, and could an existing
user answer a licensing question -- I use 99SE at work, and then to
get a few more hours a day also use the same license at home on my
laptop. I am the only user at this site. Is 2004 able to be used
this way -- ie. A
At 03:16 PM 5/31/2004, Ian wrote:
snip
The amount of traffic on this list that discusses DXP/P2004 in detail and
has the suggestions and problems
is small compared to that on other forums.
Ian - You didn't get specific, but judging by many of your prior postings,
I assume you are referring to
On 09:28 AM 1/06/2004, edsi said:
Thank You Mr Ross for providing that link. Any direct Protel affiliation
would support my previous accusations that Mr. Wilson could slightly
be a little biased by defending any position that Protel takes.
A perfectly reasonable charge if I did in
On 09:29 AM 1/06/2004, Gavin Melville said:
Hi,
I am also considering the 99SE to 2004 upgrade, and could an existing
user answer a licensing question -- I use 99SE at work, and then to
get a few more hours a day also use the same license at home on my
laptop. I am the only user at this site.
YES. unless you are in a region where Altium use node
locking, I would expect NZ is not one of these zones.
The evalation was node locked -- does that imply the actual SW will be
here as well, or was the eval node locked everywhere ??
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Gavin,
You need to ask your local Altium office this question.
Altium says that in certain parts of the world where software piracy is
common, the license is tied to the hardware. Elsewhere, the standard
license is a portable key file with a .alt extension that unlocks the
software regardless
15 matches
Mail list logo
