Re: [PEDA] Possible Gerber generation bug

2001-10-03 Thread Douglas McDonald
*** Todays forums are sponsored by Ian Martin Limited Engineering/Technical Placement Specialists www.ianmartin.com *** It's definitely NOT an RS-274X limitation and I can say that with 100%

Re: [PEDA] Possible Gerber generation bug

2001-10-05 Thread Douglas McDonald
*** Todays forums are sponsored by Ian Martin Limited Engineering/Technical Placement Specialists www.ianmartin.com *** I've talked my colleague about what can and can't be done with RS-274X -

Re: [PEDA] Possible Gerber generation bug

2001-10-05 Thread Douglas McDonald
*** Todays forums are sponsored by Ian Martin Limited Engineering/Technical Placement Specialists www.ianmartin.com *** Ian Perhaps I ought to balance my own reply by telling you that the

Re: [PEDA] shaped pads

2001-10-18 Thread Douglas McDonald
Abdul, I put your suggestion to my gerber-speaking colleague and he says that it would be easy to hook up the RS-274X in the manner that you prescribe. His only negative comments were : 1) that the definition files might be different eg one user's definition of complex-teardrop1 might

Re: [PEDA] Schematic hetero capabilities?

2001-10-24 Thread Douglas McDonald
I've seen a mechanism for achieving this recently on another tool. You can add run-time attributes to each gate such as GROUP=FPGA1 and then during annotation only parts with compatible attributes can/will be put together. This could also be very useful for defining components in isolated

Re: [PEDA] Autorouter

2001-11-19 Thread Douglas McDonald
The new router coming, we are told, might be a more serious competitor to Specctra. If this is true, then the price increases Protel might be well worth it. Even if the router was not as good as Specctra but was substantially better than the current router, it might still be worth it. So we are

Re: [PEDA] Want to know which program created some .PCB files

2001-12-21 Thread Douglas McDonald
What are the first few bytes of the files (10 or so). That shouldn't give any IP away! There might be a recognisable header... Hello all, We have been given responsibility for a large suite of technology from a defunct US company (once owned by Cadence). The schematics are in OrCad capture

Re: [PEDA] Thermals not recognised by our board house

2002-02-18 Thread Douglas McDonald
Andrew The first statement is a %AM statement which means Aperture Macro. Within this statement, standard gerber recognises CIRCLE, LINE-VECTOR, LINE-CENTER, LINE-LOWER LEFT, OUTLINE, POLYGON, MOIRE and THERMAL. I assume that TH is an abbreviation of THERMAL. 201 is the macro reference

Re: [PEDA] Thermals not recognised by our board house

2002-02-18 Thread Douglas McDonald
Andrew The rotation is almost certainly as you describe and one can only assume that 0 is upright (+) and 45 is a cross (X). I can understand why GCPREVU and others might not like the inside and outside diameters to be equal, but in any event, a directly embedded pad (via?) shouldnt need any

Re: [PEDA] Paired Mechanical layers (ex Inversion ...)

2002-02-26 Thread Douglas McDonald
Geoff, Does your suggested pairing mechanism only come into play for components which are placed on the back of the board or is it to be used elsewhere as well? Doug _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device:

Re: [PEDA] Paired Mechanical layers (ex Inversion ...)

2002-02-27 Thread Douglas McDonald
Doesn't any unpaired layer (mechanical or otherwise) preclude the implementation of a true flip board function in the future? The main concerns about flip board have been what to do with layers especially those that don't have a logical flipped layer, so doesn't adding more layers which have

Re: [PEDA] Paired Mechanical layers (ex Inversion ...)

2002-02-28 Thread Douglas McDonald
There are problems with doing X and Y flips - they don't swap layers and they leave components in upside-down. The L-Flip (layer flip) with selections is also fraught. What purpose does X Y flip serve with respect to the components themselves apart from sorting out assembly layer issues for

Re: [PEDA] delete comps not in netlist

2002-03-04 Thread Douglas McDonald
Is there any reason to have a designator for any type of passive item (nut, washer, mousebites etc)? If not, then couldn't an item of this type be designator free and therefore not subject to the netlisting interface... Doug 'delete components not in netlist' would be a lot more useful if

[PEDA] Rule precedence WAS Same net connectivity

2002-03-25 Thread Douglas McDonald
I think there are a number of precedence problems in the design rules. A useful debugging tools is to right click on one of the pads/vias and select the Applicable Binary Rules or words to that effect and it should show you what rules it thinks it is applying to the entity. Probably won't

Re: [PEDA] Boardmaker to Protel

2002-05-23 Thread Douglas McDonald
Ivor, Camtastic will get your data in verbatim no problem, but it won't be able to make any sense out it regarding components etc - gerber simply doesn't have that information. Don't forget that gerber doesn't even have any info about holes, so you can't expect any linkage in the 'Z' axis.

Re: [PEDA] XP is a dog

2002-06-22 Thread Douglas McDonald
Looks like XP eats about 100 meg of memory without anything else running. There's a neat tool called Memturbo which makes Windows run much faster for longer. It monitors memory usage and actively throws unaccessed blocks out to disk so that programs can have more real RAM. It also throws