Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great but lost features

2004-03-18 Thread Dennis Saputelli

in 99SE you don't need any specific lib opened to load a
netlist
we often use orcad netlists wher NONE of the footprints match any names
that we
will use

in that case we just place them as we see fit and the netlist load
succeeds 
without a perfect match 
this is an appropriate working method at times

ds


Ian Wilson wrote:
 

 Doesn't P99SE have the same issue.  You have always had to have the source
 libraries loaded (not opened).
 
 If a library is not loaded in the library list the component will not be
 loaded.  The difference is that DXP and P2004 allow you to specify exactly
 which library it should come from and there is none of that silly XREF
 substitution that P99SE and older could get up to.  I *love* the strict
 library management of DXP.  Going back to the Just grab it from the first
 lib in the list that has the same footprint name just doesn't cut it for
 me.  I want full control.  The thing I find irritating, a bit, is that if I
 *fully* specify the source library when nominating the footprint, should I
 really need to have that library loaded in the Library panel? Surely it can
 go fetch.
 
 Ian
 

-- 
___
Integrated Controls, Inc.   Tel: 415-647-0480  EXT 107 
2851 21st StreetFax: 415-647-3003
San Francisco, CA 94110 www.integratedcontrolsinc.com



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great but lost features

2004-03-18 Thread Ian Wilson
On 04:02 AM 19/03/2004, Dennis Saputelli said:

in 99SE you don't need any specific lib opened to load a
netlist
we often use orcad netlists wher NONE of the footprints match any names
that we
will use
in that case we just place them as we see fit and the netlist load
succeeds
without a perfect match
this is an appropriate working method at times
Dennis,

You can still manually place a component from a library and then close the 
library and then update the PCB (importing the netlist is basically the 
same as updating from a Sch in DXP - it can still be done but the process 
is different from P99SE.  I do not know if it is easier or harder as it is 
not something I do).

The match is by designator which is what you would want I assume?

Ian



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


[PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great but lost features

2004-03-17 Thread edsi
Here are few missing features in 2004 vs 99SE PCB

Tonight's missing feature is:  Option Layers,  non of the short cut keys for ALLON 
ALLOFF work anymore.   They are supposed to work but probably won't until service pack 
2.  So you have to click and pick each one with your freaking little mouse.  


I also ran into a major problem loading a netlist last night...2004 would not load my 
netlist without one specific library opened.  All of my 0603 components caused 2004 to 
yeild a ton of errors until I opened my library containing 0603s. What a pain.  

There are some cool things about the new way of loading a netlist, but overall you 
need to clear it first, the same as 99SE or it will burn you for with incorrect 
netlist information.  The loading is much faster.  I havent tried it on huge huge 
board yet but it looks much faster for netlist loading.   DRC s are faster 
too...except the online drc has a delay.  Read into this as a bug,  since it doesnt 
tell you about your violation until too late.


You know I really dont care that this stuff is still not fixed because Im smart enough 
to find the problems.  What upsets me is there are new methods to throw the same bugs 
at me.  What is this? Do l just look stupid and wrapping the same bug in another 
wrapper is going to fool me?   HA HA HA cant fool me I found WALDO, in the software. 

I am keeping 2004 because I need the other cool new features it has. It does have some 
good stuff and so far I have completed about 4 - 5 designs in 3 weeks so the learning  
curve isnt too steep if you are used to Protel software.  

Oh yea...forgot to mention long overdue featurecomplete padstacks. Well done 
Protel and about time.  Did I mention the Specta interface is much better,  I wont 
mention Spectra anymore... Let's all use Electra from ConnectEDA  

Check this out 
http://www.eedesign.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=Q1CFXLA5TWBB0QSNDBCCKHY?articleId=18400124

its a short blirp on this new router (company profile). If you havent tried it, 
download a demo.  It kicks but.  I ve done a few complex designs with it



Mike Reagan
EDSI
Frederick MD 



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great but lost features

2004-03-17 Thread Ian Wilson
On 01:58 PM 18/03/2004, edsi said:
Here are few missing features in 2004 vs 99SE PCB

Tonight's missing feature is:  Option Layers,  non of the short cut keys 
for ALLON ALLOFF work anymore.   They are supposed to work but probably 
won't until service pack 2.  So you have to click and pick each one with 
your freaking little mouse.
They all work for me.  I use these buttons all the time in both PCB and 
PCBLib.  There is *no* way I would not have commented on this before if I 
had this problem.  These are exactly the sort of productivity things (and 
dialog TAB orders) that really affect daily use.




I also ran into a major problem loading a netlist last night...2004 would 
not load my netlist without one specific library opened.  All of my 0603 
components caused 2004 to yeild a ton of errors until I opened my library 
containing 0603s. What a pain.
Doesn't P99SE have the same issue.  You have always had to have the source 
libraries loaded (not opened).

If a library is not loaded in the library list the component will not be 
loaded.  The difference is that DXP and P2004 allow you to specify exactly 
which library it should come from and there is none of that silly XREF 
substitution that P99SE and older could get up to.  I *love* the strict 
library management of DXP.  Going back to the Just grab it from the first 
lib in the list that has the same footprint name just doesn't cut it for 
me.  I want full control.  The thing I find irritating, a bit, is that if I 
*fully* specify the source library when nominating the footprint, should I 
really need to have that library loaded in the Library panel? Surely it can 
go fetch.

Ian



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great but lost features

2004-03-17 Thread Darren
Ian,

The buttons work, but the shortcut keys don't, they
have used the same keys twice, as in ALT O, was All
Off, now selects the Other Layers listooop's


Darren Moore

 -Original Message-
 From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 On 01:58 PM 18/03/2004, edsi said:
 Here are few missing features in 2004 vs 99SE PCB
 
 Tonight's missing feature is:  Option Layers,  non of the 
 short cut keys 
 for ALLON ALLOFF work anymore.   They are supposed to work 
 but probably 
 won't until service pack 2.  So you have to click and pick 
 each one with 
 your freaking little mouse.
 
 They all work for me.  I use these buttons all the time in 
 both PCB and 
 PCBLib.  There is *no* way I would not have commented on this 
 before if I 
 had this problem.  These are exactly the sort of productivity 
 things (and 
 dialog TAB orders) that really affect daily use.




* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *