More fool you and them for not taking the time to learn a useful new
feature - I will not explain it at is it is clearly not something you want
or need - still the rest of us will get on and be more productive due to
these features.
Ian
Thanks for referring me as a fool. I haven't heard
At 10:41 AM 3/29/2004, Mike Reagan wrote:
I
had a conversation with the infamous Dr. Bogotin, I am sure you may have
read his articles on impedance control. He always backs his articles
with the math. He wrote to me you cant argue when the math . He is
always right.
He's right there. You
Mr Lomax,
Please shut up with your silly philosphical drivel.
-Original Message-
From: Abd ulRahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:17 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Component Type (Ex:2004 Global edits)
At 10:41 AM 3/29/2004, Mike
Ian
Schematic:
Where are you working? I want to come work for you. I work with engineers that give
me pdf schematics from Orcad, Viewlogic, Mentor, etc. So a netlists are a must for
pcb design services.I don't sweep floors, make copies, or correct your
schematic for errors but I
On 04:21 AM 29/03/2004, edsi said:
..snip..
Component type:
I would be willing to quiz every engineer I have worked with for the past
30 years and 99 percent would not be able to correcty answer a definition
of Standard, mechanical, graphical, NET TIE, etc. Nor would they care or
even use it
-Original Message-
From: edsi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 7:21 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Component Type (Ex:2004 Global edits)
snip
Component type:
I would be willing to quiz every engineer I have worked with
for the past 30
Off topic
Can anyone tell me what the other silly choices ie Standard,
mechanical, graphical, NET TIE have to do with my component? It looks
like another PCAD migration. What is it? These options are in the
inspector.
The help gives pretty detailed info on the component type
