Title: [Urgent] A Question About Place polygon . Protel 99SE SP6 .
Dear All,
Just now, I am working on a 10 layers board, Layer construction is 1+4b+4b+1, when I try to place polygon on middle layer6 and middle layer 7, the polygon can not match the via, arc and track well, leave so
.
-Original Message-
From: Brad Velander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February 2002 19:31
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] URGENT HELP REQUIRED: Paste Mask
Jason,
did you actually design this board? Because I have a feeling that
what you're describing means that your
Subject: Re: [PEDA] URGENT HELP REQUIRED: Paste Mask
Jason, just a thought here
When you load gerbers back into a blank PCB file, you must remember that for
a given layer, all the lands that represent vias and pads etc will be
imported as free pads and will take on the design rules specified
) 292-9010
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.norsat.com
See us at Booth 323 at Satellite 2002 in Washington, DC March 6-8.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:08 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] URGENT HELP
Jason,
I did not follow this one from the very beginning but,
I would also 100% agree that bringing a gerber file back into your
CAD system for any reason other than to use it to reproduce
a board you have no CAD data for, or copy sections into an
existing board etc. is not good. I would NOT
Hi,
As normal we load the gerbers back into protel to check they look right,
I've noticed that
the tented vias have solder on them on the paste mask. Why, and how do I
get rid of it?
I've never noticed this before but can't say it hasn't happened.
We're just about to spin the boards and want
PROTECTED]
http://www.norsat.com
See us at Booth 323 at Satellite 2002 in Washington, DC March 6-8.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] URGENT HELP REQUIRED: Paste Mask
At 06:36 PM 2/18/2002 +, you wrote:
As normal we load the gerbers back into protel to check they look right,
I've noticed that
the tented vias have solder on them on the paste mask. Why, and how do I
get rid of it?
(1) are you sure that they are vias and not free pads?
(2) what are the
for viewing Gerber files.
Leon Fonstin
-Original Message-
From: Jason Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2002 5:36 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum (E-mail)
Subject: [PEDA] URGENT HELP REQUIRED: Paste Mask
Importance: High
Hi,
As normal we load the gerbers back
Whitesell
Sunrise Labs
-Original Message-
From: Sean James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] URGENT!!!
What would keep a polygon pour from not forming if
A. There are no keepouts.
B. There are no areas present to create
make sure that remove dead copper is not selected.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: Sean James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:28 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] URGENT!!!
What would keep a polygon pour from not forming if
A. There are no keepouts
May be there is nothing to connect No pad ) on that net in that area.
Narinder
- Original Message -
From: Sean James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:28 PM
Subject: [PEDA] URGENT!!!
What would keep a polygon pour from
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] URGENT!!!
What would keep a polygon pour from not forming if
A. There are no keepouts.
B. There are no areas present to create dead copper pours.
C. I am pouring over the same net.
Sean James
PCB Designer
Telecast Fiber Systems, Inc.
102 Grove Street
Worcester, MA
Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: [PEDA] URGENT!!!
What would keep a polygon pour from not forming if
A. There are no keepouts.
B. There are no areas present to create dead copper pours.
C. I am pouring over the same net.
Sean James
PCB Designer
Telecast
Insure that polygons are not hidden under the show/hide options of the
display.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Narinder Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] URGENT!!!
May be there is nothing to connect
, December 12, 2001 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] URGENT!!!
Has it successfully poured before now?
Is it just pouring outlines? - do you have No hatching selected?
Do you have minimum primitive size set to something outrageous?
Just some real quick thought.
HTH
Brendon.
- Original Message
At 03:28 PM 12/12/01 -0500, Sean James wrote:
What would keep a polygon pour from not forming if
A. There are no keepouts.
B. There are no areas present to create dead copper pours.
C. I am pouring over the same net.
Try turning off remove dead copper, see what you get. Dead copper is any
Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:56 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] URGENT!!!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post
(604) 292-9089 (direct line)
Fax (604) 292-9010
Website: www.norsat.com
-Original Message-
From: Bagotronix Tech Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:24 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] URGENT!!!
Hey, Abdul:
If any ATS dollars are to be paid
gap rule is small enough so that a polygon can
actually be built.
Brian Guralnick
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Adair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] URGENT!!!
| Insure that polygons
All,
Do you find these components (in the negative quadrant) in the gerber or
pick and place outputs?
jmc
Ian Wilson wrote:
At 10:09 AM 25/10/01 +1000, you wrote:
Ian, it's actually pretty easy to loose parts.
We recently have had a situation where a group of components have been
I have had a library update cause a part to go haywire when the origin of
the library part was way off from the center of the part. This was due to
the library being imported from another package if I remember correctly.
I have had a component move off the viewable area, and found a way to fix
At 07:52 AM 10/24/01 +0200, Emanuel Zimmermann wrote:
Maybe that the reference point for the .lib part moved for whatever reason.
This can cause the component to be placed out of the working area after update
PCB operation.
Good thinking.
Yes, that would do it, and it is not a terribly uncommon
On 03:07 PM 24/10/2001 -0700, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax said:
At 07:52 AM 10/24/01 +0200, Emanuel Zimmermann wrote:
Maybe that the reference point for the .lib part moved for whatever reason.
This can cause the component to be placed out of the working area after
update
PCB operation.
Good thinking.
out.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2001 8:36 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Urgent help needed
On 03:07 PM 24/10/2001 -0700, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax said:
At 07:52 AM 10/24/01 +0200, Emanuel Zimmermann wrote:
Maybe
At 10:09 AM 25/10/01 +1000, you wrote:
Ian, it's actually pretty easy to loose parts.
We recently have had a situation where a group of components have been
unknowingly moved into the negative region of the database as part of a
move selection process early in the placement stage. It turns out
Hi,
I was updating from a pcb library a footprint of
a BGA component, however, the component disappeared
completely.
What went wrong? is there anyway to recover? It doesn't accept
undo, and it's very difficult to position a new BGA footprint
in place of the disappeared one. Back up is
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:06 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Urgent help needed
Hi,
I was updating from a pcb library a footprint of
a BGA component, however, the component disappeared
completely.
What went wrong? is there anyway to recover
On 02:06 PM 23/10/2001 -0400, M. Wahab said:
Hi,
I was updating from a pcb library a footprint of
a BGA component, however, the component disappeared
completely.
This sounds odd. Was there anything unusual about the footprint? How did
you do the update, by pressing Update PCB from
At 02:06 PM 10/23/01 -0400, M. Wahab wrote:
I was updating from a pcb library a footprint of
a BGA component, however, the component disappeared
completely.
What went wrong? is there anyway to recover? It doesn't accept
undo, and it's very difficult to position a new BGA footprint
in place
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
(1) I don't know what happened.
Maybe that the reference point for the .lib part moved for whatever reason.
This can cause the component to be placed out of the working area after update
PCB operation.
(3) (Good practice leaves track ends
coincident with
33 matches
Mail list logo
