Re: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs

2002-06-27 Thread Rudolf Schaffer

Ian,

Effectively, this kind of PCB are only used with
stable mechanical support (generally machined RF enclosures).
The optional breakable part of the PCB is considered like
a totally independent print with it's own mechanical fixation;
holes have sufficient tolerances in diameter to avoid
constraints. The only  precautions are taken during
components placement, soldering, initial test and transport,
In fact, it is as if we had 2 well fixed independant PCB
connected by some resistors.

Have a nice day,

Rudolf

- Original Message -
From: Ian Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs


 On 08:15 AM 26/06/2002 +0200, Rudolf Schaffer said:
 Hello,
 
 In this case, we use v-grooving and SMD 0 ohm
 with a convenient foot-print, for each
 net (if not too many!) crossing over.
 
 We naturally have 2 plans d'implantation depending
 upon the cutted/non cutted PCB part.
 
 Have a nice day,
 
 Rudolf Schaffer

 Rudolf,

 I am intrigued by this.

 How do you prevent flexing of the board from transferring stress onto the
 small surface mount resistors and cracking them or the solder joints?  A
 V-groove flexes at quite a sharp angle. (by design). I guess some thing
 like this would never be used in anything but very stable controlled
 environments.

 Actually now that I think about it this stress is a problem also for the
 routed/break-off tab implementation but maybe the copper is a little more
 malleable than those ceramic resistors.

 Ian Wilson



 
 * Tracking #: 533015C9F8865B4F90F49353E155EDDCD7B65F11
 *
 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs

2002-06-26 Thread Rudolf Schaffer

Hello,

In this case, we use v-grooving and SMD 0 ohm
with a convenient foot-print, for each
net (if not too many!) crossing over.

We naturally have 2 plans d'implantation depending
upon the cutted/non cutted PCB part.

Have a nice day,

Rudolf Schaffer

RD Engineer
Phone +41 32 754 38 33
Fax +41 32 754 38 36
Web   www.livetools.tv
- Original Message -
From: Bagotronix Tech Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:16 PM
Subject: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs


 Hello, all:

 We have had our domain transferred to a new ISP last week, so e-mail has
 just begun working normally (I hope!).

 Anyway, I want to make a PCB that has a break-off area with extra
 circuitry on it.  The idea is that some users may not need the extra
 circuitry, so they can break off that area of the board to reduce the
size.
 I know this is easy for cheap PCB material (phenolic, etc.) but does this
 work with FR-4 and such?

 If this is feasible with FR-4, what technique should I use to make the
 break-off?  I assume I will have to lay out a bunch of unplated holes
spaced
 in a line, with traces going inbetween holes.  And I assume that the way
to
 indicate this to the fab is to put comments on the drill layer.

 Thanks in advance for your help.  If no one replies, I will assume our
 e-mail still isn't working right.

 Best regards,
 Ivan Baggett
 Bagotronix Inc.
 website:  www.bagotronix.com




 
 * Tracking #: E0D56A16817ACA4091A0139DC100BD9938215AA3
 *
 


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs

2002-06-26 Thread Igor Gmitrovic

I used via/hole size of 1mm/0.7mm. Could be smaller if they had sharp tool for 
V-grooving.

Igor

-Original Message-
From: Danny Bishop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 June 2002 2:44 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs


not a bad idea if you use big vias

 -Original Message-
 From: Igor Gmitrovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, 26 June 2002 11:44 AM
 To: Protel EDA Forum
 Subject: Re: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs
 
 
 Ivan,
 
 you could V-groove the board and put vias on the tracks where 
 they cross the V-groove line.
 
 Igor
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, 25 June 2002 11:14 PM
 To: Protel EDA Forum
 Subject: Re: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs
 
 
 Ivan,
 
 Yes you can use FR4. I would score the board and use ribbon cable
 to interconnect from board A to board B.
 
 Jim
 
 Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
 
  Hello, all:
 
  We have had our domain transferred to a new ISP last week, 
 so e-mail has
  just begun working normally (I hope!).
 
  Anyway, I want to make a PCB that has a break-off area with extra
  circuitry on it.  The idea is that some users may not need the extra
  circuitry, so they can break off that area of the board to 
 reduce the size.
  I know this is easy for cheap PCB material (phenolic, etc.) 
 but does this
  work with FR-4 and such?
 
  If this is feasible with FR-4, what technique should I use 
 to make the
  break-off?  I assume I will have to lay out a bunch of 
 unplated holes spaced
  in a line, with traces going inbetween holes.  And I assume 
 that the way to
  indicate this to the fab is to put comments on the drill layer.
 
  Thanks in advance for your help.  If no one replies, I will 
 assume our
  e-mail still isn't working right.
 
  Best regards,
  Ivan Baggett
  Bagotronix Inc.
  website:  www.bagotronix.com
 
 
 **
 **
 * Tracking #: FA14B7B41BC3F5459A4E929EDF87298D738F4111
 *
 **
 **
 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs

2002-06-26 Thread Ian Wilson

On 08:15 AM 26/06/2002 +0200, Rudolf Schaffer said:
Hello,

In this case, we use v-grooving and SMD 0 ohm
with a convenient foot-print, for each
net (if not too many!) crossing over.

We naturally have 2 plans d'implantation depending
upon the cutted/non cutted PCB part.

Have a nice day,

Rudolf Schaffer

Rudolf,

I am intrigued by this.

How do you prevent flexing of the board from transferring stress onto the 
small surface mount resistors and cracking them or the solder joints?  A 
V-groove flexes at quite a sharp angle. (by design). I guess some thing 
like this would never be used in anything but very stable controlled 
environments.

Actually now that I think about it this stress is a problem also for the 
routed/break-off tab implementation but maybe the copper is a little more 
malleable than those ceramic resistors.

Ian Wilson




* Tracking #: 533015C9F8865B4F90F49353E155EDDCD7B65F11
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs

2002-06-26 Thread Tim Fifield

Just FYI

Design for breakaway tabs can be found in IPC Standard IPC- although I
personally don't find it very helpful...

Tim Fifield

-Original Message-
From: Danny Bishop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:39 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs


Ivan

the technique you describe is a standard way to panelize/depanelize boards
with FR4( to be used with routing, rather than scoring/v-grooving), but I
don't know about running tracks between them. I wouldn't break it off with
copper connecting the two parts together. Perhaps you should consider an IDC
connector between the two.

Danny




 -Original Message-
 From: Bagotronix Tech Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, 25 June 2002 5:16 AM
 To: Protel EDA Forum
 Subject: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs


 Hello, all:

 We have had our domain transferred to a new ISP last week, so
 e-mail has
 just begun working normally (I hope!).

 Anyway, I want to make a PCB that has a break-off area with extra
 circuitry on it.  The idea is that some users may not need the extra
 circuitry, so they can break off that area of the board to
 reduce the size.
 I know this is easy for cheap PCB material (phenolic, etc.)
 but does this
 work with FR-4 and such?

 If this is feasible with FR-4, what technique should I use to make the
 break-off?  I assume I will have to lay out a bunch of
 unplated holes spaced
 in a line, with traces going inbetween holes.  And I assume
 that the way to
 indicate this to the fab is to put comments on the drill layer.

 Thanks in advance for your help.  If no one replies, I will assume our
 e-mail still isn't working right.

 Best regards,
 Ivan Baggett
 Bagotronix Inc.
 website:  www.bagotronix.com




 **
 **
 * Tracking #: E0D56A16817ACA4091A0139DC100BD9938215AA3
 *
 **
 **




* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs

2002-06-26 Thread ttontis

I would use a ribbon cable that was previously suggested, or use a
flex circuit. Running traces to the edge of a board would cause lamination
and corrosion problems. If the copper is run through the tab and then the
board is snapped apart that copper track will be exposed on the edge. Also
there would be no ground or power plane under the tracks, unless it is not a
multilayer board
After removal of the unneeded card it could be possible for those
tracks to become an unwanted antenna.

Regards,

Ted


* Tracking #: EDA8C6609E34194CA37E9C3B230CC8E9EB73FAA0
*


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] PCB breakoffs

2002-06-26 Thread Dennis Saputelli

i concur with this
i can say from experience that running traces through the breakaway area
is problematic
ok for protos maybe
the traces tear and flop around, sometimes peeling way back
for limited production you could dremel a 'wide' area of the trace and
then break away

Dennis Saputelli


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I would use a ribbon cable that was previously suggested, or use a
 flex circuit. Running traces to the edge of a board would cause lamination
 and corrosion problems. If the copper is run through the tab and then the
 board is snapped apart that copper track will be exposed on the edge. Also
 there would be no ground or power plane under the tracks, unless it is not a
 multilayer board
 After removal of the unneeded card it could be possible for those
 tracks to become an unwanted antenna.
 
 Regards,
 
 Ted
 
 
 * Tracking #: EDA8C6609E34194CA37E9C3B230CC8E9EB73FAA0
 *
 

-- 
___
www.integratedcontrolsinc.comIntegrated Controls, Inc.
   tel: 415-647-04802851 21st Street  
  fax: 415-647-3003San Francisco, CA 94110

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *