PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 2:28 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE memory errors
I've found that many of my print preview problems have been solved by
re-installing the printer driver.
Ian Rozowsky
RD Director
Centurion Systems (Pty) Ltd.
Box 506 Cramerview
Jeff Adolphs wrote:
Hi! I am getting memory error when I click on print preview from the pcb layout. I
have uninstalled Protel 99SE and reinstalled with Sevice Pack 6. I have Windows 2000
and 1/2 gig of RAM. Protel 99SE has worked well for a long time on my current machine.
Could the latest
Jeff,
Have you tried unloading and re-installing your printers?
My regards,
Steve Smith
Staco Energy Products Co.
301 Gaddis Boulevard.
Dayton, OH 45403
Telephone: (937) 253-1191 Ext. 158
Fax: (937) 253-1723
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site: www.stacoenergy.com
www.stacopower.com
Hi Ray,
The standard DOS text format is ASCII. Just give them a text file that isn't
made with any word processing file but is a standard ASCII text file... they
should be able to read that.
The normal output from Protel 99SE for pick and place, is available in 3
option, CSV or comma delimited
Thanks for all the replies. I gave up and did a clean install
and everything seems to be working --- for now.
My regards,
Steve Smith
-Original Message-
From: Brooks,Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 2:22 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA
The number one reason for losing the ability to open either PCB or
Schematic files within Protel is file association problems. Protel's
authors didn't like the idea of sharing, (MIO) so they conveniently
demanded sole ownership of the file extensions .pcb and .sch
You have likely lost the .pcb
One thing to check is your printer selection. Open a schematic (or text file) and
make sure the selected printer is the same as your default printer. This happens
fairly often around here ( 14 schematic seats and 3 PCB seats ). Its worth a try.
Duane Foster
-Original Message-
Steve,
Check your downward pointing grey arrow in the upper left hand corner
select security, and check to see that your licensing has not been
corrupted...
I noticed when I loaded a copy of AutoTrax on my system that it messed up my
Protel licensing and I had to re-enter the codes all over
the spectraa router?
as far as i know it always comes back w/ 28 holes
pretty easy to fix if you don't forget, but somewhat bush league
the 99SE router only uses the board via and i haven't seen it trash the
hole size
there are 3 candidates for sizes for a given type have you checked all 3
size
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 5:55 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE crashes when Printing PCB
On 06:21 AM 13/03/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
or Geoff Harland,
but I don't think Geoff's posted since being acquired by ProtAltium)
Geoff Harland
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 6:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE crashes when Printing PCB
Hi Steve,
This KB item may help:
http://www.altium.com/protel/kb/kb_item.asp?ID=2753
Best regards
Look here:
http://www.ultracad.com/calc.htm
-Original Message-
From: prathibha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 13 March 2004 21:27
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE crashes when Printing PCB
Can anyone tell me which tool is best to use
Can anyone tell me which tool is best to use for
inpedance calculations and currect calculations ?
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
*
12/03/2004 13:35:07, Steve Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Any Ideas?
You do have a printer driver installed (and defaulted to) on that
machine? Bad stuff (tm) happens if you don't.
Steve
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL
, 2004 8:43 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE crashes when Printing PCB
12/03/2004 13:35:07, Steve Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Any Ideas?
You do have a printer driver installed (and defaulted to) on that
machine? Bad stuff (tm) happens if you don't.
Steve
Steve,
Two things come to mind that you might try.
First - make sure your printer driver is current. There have been numerous
problems that have been traced back to the printer driver.
Second (and not so obvious) - the video driver may be causing the crash. I
had similar problems a long time
, C.I.D.
Product Engineer
Staco Energy Products Co.
Web Site: www.stacoenergy.com
www.stacopower.com
-Original Message-
From: Harry Selfridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 12:37 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE crashes when Printing PCB
Geoff's posted since being acquired by ProtAltium)
-Original Message-
From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 1:43 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE crashes when Printing PCB
I installed Protel on another system (same type box
.
_
Brian Guralnick
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE crashes when Printing PCB
I've never personally experienced this problem, but I do rememeber a
ways back when folks were talking about
:42 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE crashes when Printing PCB
Ohhh boy, this is an oldy.
I cant remember what was done to fix the problem, but, if you
search the
[PEDA] archives for printer driver crash, you will find a bundle of
issues.
I do remember
: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: Brian Guralnick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE crashes when Printing PCB
Ohhh boy, this is an oldy.
I cant remember what was done to fix the problem
file printer sharing
back on, as well as re-install any other printer drivers you may need.
_
Brian Guralnick
- Original Message -
From: Steve Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE
Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE crashes when Printing PCB
Ohhh boy, this is an oldy.
I cant remember what was done to fix the problem, but, if you search the
[PEDA] archives for printer driver crash, you will find a bundle
Hi Steve,
This KB item may help:
http://www.altium.com/protel/kb/kb_item.asp?ID=2753
Best regards,
James Harriman
Altium
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PEDA] Protel 99SE crashes when Printing PCB
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:35:07 -0500
Hi
On 06:21 AM 13/03/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
or Geoff Harland,
but I don't think Geoff's posted since being acquired by ProtAltium)
Geoff Harland posts on the DXP forum.
Ian
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave
]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE crashes when Printing PCB
Brian,
Thanks, Colby Siemer at Altium has me going down this path
but I am having problems deleting one of the drivers
(Hmm...could be the problem child?)
My thanks,
Steve Smith, C.I.D
At 10:51 AM 2/18/2004, Robert Ritchey wrote:
I am looking for a 99SE license. Since I have not done this before, does
anyone know what documentation Protel requires to prove to them I bought
the license to qualify for future upgrades if we decide (its getting so
expensive
and so many features we
Hi Robert,
I just purchased a license for Protel 99SE from an individual in Alabama. I
located him from a users group,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protel-users-resale/ on the web. He gave me
his license number, and I called Altium to verify that it was active. I
contacted him and sent a
Robert Ritchey wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a 99SE license. Since I have not done this before, does
anyone know what documentation Protel requires to prove to them I bought
the license to qualify for future upgrades if we decide (its getting
so expensive
and so many features we really don't
You just gotta make sure they haven't already used it to upgrade.
Leon Fonstin
-Original Message-
From: Jon Elson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 19 February 2004 6:05 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE for sale?
Robert Ritchey wrote:
Hi,
I am looking
Jeff,
I can't say I've ever heard of that happening before. The only
thing I can think of is to check and see if the icons are still in the
system folder for 99se. If not, they should be on the CDROM somewhere.
As far as your question regarding when to repair, all I go by is
the
i wonder if the icons are handled by windows
i certainly see flaky icon behavior by windows
re repair
i have never had it do anything useful (or harmful) for me
Dennis Saputelli
Jeff Adolphs wrote:
Have you ever had the Protel 99SE Explorer file type icons disappear? I have tried a
fresh
09/01/2004 20:29:10, Jeff Adolphs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you ever had the Protel 99SE Explorer file type icons
disappear?
Yes - running VNC makes it happen, every time... Not sure who's
to blae, but a restart of Protel once I've stopped using VNC puts
all to rights... I don't worry
No problems on XP pro version
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Dom Bragge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 January 2004 23:40
To: Protel EDA Forum
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on WinXP?
Website Visitor wrote:
Does anyone have any experience running Protel 99SE
-
From: Dom Bragge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:40 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on WinXP?
Website Visitor wrote:
Does anyone have any experience running Protel 99SE on WinXP? I'm
curious whether it will work
We run 99SE sp6 on Win XP and have not experienced any difficulty per
station. We did have one issue with one of our designers on a hub
network whereby every time he launched 99SE it froze the rest of us. We
upgraded his station to DXP and the problem was solved. However, 99SE
is not
Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on WinXP?
We run 99SE sp6 on Win XP and have not experienced any difficulty per
station. We did have one issue with one of our designers on a hub
network whereby every time he launched 99SE it froze the rest of us. We
upgraded his station to DXP
Website Visitor wrote:
Does anyone have any experience running Protel 99SE on WinXP? I'm curious whether it will work at all.
Yes, it works here.
--
Regards,
Dom
Dom Bragge, CID MIEEE | Silverbrook Research PL, PO Box 207
Snr PCB Layout Engr| Balmain NSW 2041, AUSTRALIA
Ph
Website Visitor wrote:
Does anyone have any experience running Protel 99SE on WinXP? I'm curious whether it will work at all.
Thanks,
Vince
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted from Association web site by: Vince Bafetti
I use both 98 and 99SE on WinXP (and previously on Win2K) with no problems.
--
I had major problems with XP and P99SE , due to probably not having all the
relevent permissions and settings sorted out on my machine. I eventually got W2K
installed and am running my machine pretty much as a system admin level for it
to work correctly.
BR Clive
Website Visitor [EMAIL
At 09:39 AM 1/7/2004, Website Visitor wrote:
Does anyone have any experience running Protel 99SE on WinXP? I'm curious
whether it will work at all.
It's running fine for me, I have WinXP on my newest notebook.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message:
My post haven't reached the Forum, again, so I repost:
Website Visitor wrote:
snip
If you had a port that was supposed to match a port on another page,
but you mispelled one of them, had a space in one of them, etc.
you wouldn't know it by using the ERC. That seems really strange to me!
snip
Wojciech,
Thank you, thank you! That reporter is a great way to
verify that all ports have a mate. Thanks again!
Travis
My post haven't reached the Forum, again, so I repost:
Website Visitor wrote:
snip
If you had a port that was supposed to match a port
on another page,
but you
Regarding the situation of a power port connected to the end of a resistor
with no other instance of that power port in the schematic, i.e., it is a
single-pin net, Mr. Saputelli wrote:
i don't think 99SE ERC will catch this
With the default error matrix, yes, it does not. However, if you set
At 02:48 AM 12/22/2003, Hamid A. Wasti wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Actually, I know only two reasons, legitimately, not to move to DXP if
you are currently a 99SE user.
(1) You don't have time for retraining right now *and*
(2) You can't spare the cash right now.
Any others?
(3) You want
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Actually, I know only two reasons, legitimately, not to move to DXP if
you are currently a 99SE user.
(1) You don't have time for retraining right now *and*
(2) You can't spare the cash right now.
Any others?
(3) You want to retain all the functionality that you
,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE ERC
At 09:42 PM 12/19/2003, Dennis Saputelli wrote:
i once had a power port symbol +12V2 connected to one end of
a resistor
the rest of the board was all +12V for that power and i didn't
notice it
good 'ol cut and paste - it wasn't my fault! :)
anyway the resistor didn't go anywhere on one end
and in
At 07:53 PM 12/19/2003, Tony Karavidas wrote:
There are so many reasons voiced as to why to not move to DXP.
Here is one reason TO MOVE to DXP. It now checks for that error.
Actually, I know only two reasons, legitimately, not to move to DXP if you
are currently a 99SE user.
(1) You don't have
i don't think 99SE ERC will catch this
i did look into it at that time, i will look again later
Dennis Saputelli
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 09:42 PM 12/19/2003, Dennis Saputelli wrote:
i once had a power port symbol +12V2 connected to one end of
a resistor
the rest of the board was
: Friday, December 19, 2003 6:43 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE ERC
ok, point taken, thanks for the encouragement, keep 'em coming
how about this one:
i once had a power port symbol +12V2 connected to one end
of a resistor
the rest of the board was all +12V
If you look in Tools/ERC/Rule matrix There are blocks that can be set up to
check for unconnected input ports, output ports etc.
Jerry Fisher C.I.D.
Assoc. Elec. Engineer
Pelco
10 corporate Dr.
Orangeburg N.Y. 10962
(845)398-8700
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
There are so many reasons voiced as to why to not move to DXP.
Here is one reason TO MOVE to DXP. It now checks for that error.
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Website Visitor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 6:29 AM
To: proteledaforum
Subject: [PEDA]
ok, point taken, thanks for the encouragement, keep 'em coming
how about this one:
i once had a power port symbol +12V2 connected to one end of
a resistor
the rest of the board was all +12V for that power and i didn't
notice it
good 'ol cut and paste - it wasn't my fault! :)
anyway the
-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 25 October 2003 10:03
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE
I'm not sure I know what the disjointed line problem is. I
think I may
see, occasionally, some drawing artifacts
This is a funny problem because I have a twin head Geforce 2 MX card and don't have
the problem. (Or at least I haven't noticed it in a long time) I do remember it on
other machines in the past...
I'm using the latest integrated drivers from the Nvidia (they work better than the OEM
driver and
At 06:55 PM 10/23/2003, you wrote:
I have seen the disjointed line problem on every single installation of
Protel99SE I've come across (about a dozen or so) and refuse to believe that
it is hardware related - how could so many different systems all have the
same hardware problem? - unless Protel
I bet it's that darn FLOAT issue.
_
Brian Guralnick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Ian Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE
Boy oh boy, this forum is becoming
Mark,
At any rate, my point was that I just don't remember where I
obtained the drivers but my current display card/driver allows 99SE
schematic to display and pan without the disjointed graphics exhibited by
past display cards that I've used.
I'm currently running with a two year old Nvidia
At 01:52 PM 10/22/2003, Peter Montgomery wrote:
I have been using Protel 2.8 for a long time now. I recently came across a
30 day demo disk of Protel 99SE that Protel had sent me. I decided to
install it to see what I have been missing by not upgrading. I have sort of
just looked around a
I have seen the disjointed line problem on every single installation of
Protel99SE I've come across (about a dozen or so) and refuse to believe that
it is hardware related - how could so many different systems all have the
same hardware problem? - unless Protel wrote the code for one specific
Abd,
Thank you for you well written and well considered reply. While I do not
agree with all you say, I respect you taking the time to address the issues
in such a detailed manner. I have some further replies below.
1 - It's no faster than Protel 2.8 PCB and Advanced Schematic 3.0. I
would
Boy oh boy, this forum is becoming verbose!
On my setup I can see slightly offset lines occasionally on autopan in
P99SE. I can't in DXP so either it is fixed or much rarer.
I can think of all sorts of reasons why the problem may be there in P99SE
but not DXP:
1) It has been fixed - generally
what you say notwithstanding ...
IMHO 99SE is a big big improvement over the older tools
i too see the broken (actually shifted) line thing a tiny bit on
schematic
but it doesn't really bother me much, it has never caused me a
misinterpretaion of the the wires
at the first pan or PgDn it is
Yeah, I get the broken schematic wire thing on my workstation too. Using a
Matrox G450 video card.
If you like Protel 2.8 and don't see the benefit to 99SE, then by all means
stay with 2.8. I still use 2.8 occasionally, for the pin swapping feature.
When manually optimizing routing for a 2
I believe it is a driver issue. I haven't seen the display problem in
years. I'm also using a Matrox G450, but I've reinstalled windows several
times over the years and I don't remember if the drivers were taken from
the Matrox CDROM or some other source.
Mark Koitmaa
At 01:17 PM
).
Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: Mark Koitmaa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE
I believe it is a driver issue. I haven't
]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE
I believe it is a driver issue. I haven't seen the display problem in
years. I'm also using a Matrox G450, but I've reinstalled windows several
times over the years and I don't remember
On 07:18 AM 23/10/2003, Mark Koitmaa said:
I believe it is a driver issue.
I agree, Mark, about the driver - I suspect the mouse driver :-).
Ian
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
*
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE
I believe it is a driver issue. I haven't seen the display problem in
years. I'm also using a Matrox G450, but I've reinstalled windows several
times over the years and I don't remember if the drivers were taken
Dennis Saputelli wrote:
we also religiously close before just as you do and still SAW it
it would happen during the file closing just like when closing protel
without first closing all the windows and files
over a six or seven different computer boxes only one showed this
problem and not
http://memtest86.com
It's da bomb...
Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: Jon Elson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE hangups
Steve,
I sometimes had databases refusing to compact because of the temporary
file (filename.ldb) accidently marked some other engineers to access the
ddb. If this is the case in your situation, close P99SE and delete the
.ldb file within explorer.
W2k SP2? Basically I agree with you but
://www.norsat.com
-Original Message-
From: Igor Gmitrovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 16/07/2003 8:32 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Cc:
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE experience
Hi Choong,
upgrade to service pack 6, make sure you have at least 256MB of RAM and a good video
card.
Regards
Hi Choong,
upgrade to service pack 6, make sure you have at least 256MB of RAM and a good video
card.
Regards,
Igor
-Original Message-
From: Choong Keat Yian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2003 1:10 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Protel 99SE experience
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Igor Gmitrovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 16/07/2003 8:32 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Cc:
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE experience
Hi Choong,
upgrade to service pack 6, make sure you have at least 256MB of RAM and a good
video card
Ivan,
A few years back my RD group did this same drill, I think we ended up doing
a DXF or maybe it was impossible, in any case all electrical connectivity
was lost in the end. If you find a solution please do share with the rest of
us. Thanks
Joe
- Original Message -
From: Bagotronix
At 03:26 PM 10/31/2002 +0100, Peder K. Hellegaard wrote:
I have a Protel 99SE license for sale. Interested ?
Please send off-group to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
One notice was, at least, enough; two posts to this list in a few days is
definitely too much.
There is a mailing list, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wollongong
Australia
- Original Message -
From: Rolf Molitor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE Simulator Piecewise Linear Current Source
Alfonso,
i had the same problem some time ago and i gave up
Oops!!
A couple of mistakes...
In the data file you have to start the data with a + symbol and the line I
gave is wrong !
this what I wrote earlier
netlist=%D %1 %2 DC %F1 PWL | + ( | %IF(%F4 ) %IF(.INCLUDE %F5) ) %IF(AC
%F2 %F3)
I didn't test it properly... it breaks when you dont use a
I noticed that the text was missing from my post in the archives so I
thought I'd better post this again.
I apologise if you guys are getting this twice but just in case...
- Original Message -
From: Alfonso Baz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
PROTECTED]
An: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Oktober 2002 10:36
Betreff: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE Simulator Piecewise Linear Current Source
I noticed that the text was missing from my post in the archives so I
thought I'd better post this again.
I apologise if you guys
Hello,
Lloyd, I also tried to send you an e-mail off-line but it failed.
We have 2 Protel 99SE licenses for sale. So if you are interested, you can
contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards
Isabelle Baudry
*
Ivan wrote
I hope that one Compaq is the only one you ever bought. I had one some
years ago (PII-266) and it was absolute junk. Yes, Compaq does make
proprietary version of Windows for their PCs. How smart is that - a
proprietary version of a proprietary OS?
Yea it is my only
- Original Message -
From: Dave Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on Windows XP
Yes. It runs great.
-Original Message-
From: Upton Charles R CNIN
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on Windows XP
Has anyone else determined that Administrator rights are
necessary to run 99se reliably?
For whatever reason, I'm forced to use the runas command to
execute Protel...
(digging into my fuzzy memory, I suspect protel had trouble
writing
Message -
From: Michael Reagan (EDSI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on Windows XP
Charlie,
I ran 99se on XP for a while. It really didn't run any better than
running
on W98. I eventually had
: Friday, August 16, 2002 5:53 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on Windows XP
Has anyone else determined that Administrator rights are
necessary to run 99se reliably?
* Tracking
-Original Message-
From: Bagotronix Tech Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 16 August 2002 11:05 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on Windows XP
Mike:
I hope that one Compaq is the only one you ever bought. I had one some
years ago (PII
Yes. It works fine. I'm using XPPro
-Original Message-
From: Upton Charles R CNIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on Windows XP
Has anyone tried to run 99SE on XP?
Thanks,
Charlie
yes been been running a copy on XP pro since it was released, no issues
whatsoever.
- Original Message -
From: Upton Charles R CNIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 6:10 PM
Subject: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on Windows XP
Has anyone
Charlie,
I ran 99se on XP for a while. It really didn't run any better than running
on W98. I eventually had to uninstall XP and reload W 98 after experiencing
3 fatal crashes.These weren't Protel related. XP did everything wrong,
it crashed, banged my harddrive until I found out how to
Was your hardware 'approved' to run XP? Did you run that checker on the
MS site? Is it only a year old?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Reagan (EDSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 7:54 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on Windows
Yes. It runs great.
-Original Message-
From: Upton Charles R CNIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 5:10 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Protel 99SE on Windows XP
Has anyone tried to run 99SE on XP?
Thanks,
Charlie
On 11:07 AM 28/03/2002 +0100, Isabelle Baudry said:
I confirm this behaviour. I have reproduced the problem with Protel SP6.
Isabelle Baudry
Isabelle,
Thanks for that work - into the bug database it will go (soon).
Ian Wilson
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To
The bug -- yes, there is a bug -- involves some behavior that I have not
seen described before.
If a footprint pad holding net data is moved outside the workspace, the net
data for the pad is effectively gone *except* that the pad itself, if moved
back into the workspace, edit dialog will
At 08:30 AM 3/28/2002 +, Paul Holland wrote:
As far as reporting the issue to Protel direct, we are just checking that
our client is happy for us to send the rogue design to them. If not, I will
send my little semi-recreation.
There is no need to send Protel your working file. This bug can
Paul,
You certainly pose a good question, but I believe 10 mil is the limits
of Protels workspace. What happens outside of the workspace is anyone's
guess. I have connected 50- 60 designs a year with thousands of
connections each, multiply that times 5 years and I have only ever had one
Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE Un-routed nets bug?
Paul,
You certainly pose a good question, but I believe 10 mil is the limits
of Protels workspace. What happens outside of the workspace is anyone's
guess. I have connected 50- 60 designs a year with thousands of
connections each
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
