Re: [PEDA] Re[2]: DXP: Free updates?
Thanks for the info. I wasn't aware of the servicepacks. There appears to have been a communication problem then. I see the point, ATS includes one year of servicepacks. I'm probably going to get DXP at the latest possible date before the conditions drop. Rene Phillip Stevens wrote: Rene, 3.0 had at least 1 SP. 98 had 3 SP. 99SE was at SP6. Past performance may not be an indication of future performance, but, for fun, try the following: Superimpose an imaginary ATS program (had one existed at the time) over the SP release dates of 99SE, and ask yourself which service pack level you would now be running at, had you only the one year of included ATS? Assume you bought P99SE on the first day it was released. Would running at that SP level have been acceptable to you? Or would you have required an update? * Tracking #: 4C071A37CB9451479307F53F3D4E5BC486AC0860 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Re: [PEDA] Re[2]: DXP: Free updates?
To make things worse, what about all the poor people who bought Protel in the last year, got the 'FREE' ATS for a year, but it will run out long before DXP has been released for a year? -Original Message- From: Phillip Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 4:03 PM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: [PEDA] Re[2]: DXP: Free updates? Rene, 3.0 had at least 1 SP. 98 had 3 SP. 99SE was at SP6. Past performance may not be an indication of future performance, but, for fun, try the following: Superimpose an imaginary ATS program (had one existed at the time) over the SP release dates of 99SE, and ask yourself which service pack level you would now be running at, had you only the one year of included ATS? Assume you bought P99SE on the first day it was released. Would running at that SP level have been acceptable to you? Or would you have required an update? ---Phil * Tracking #: 81640696098E7D45B4AA40556D3F8B4845206DE7 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Re: [PEDA] Re[2]: DXP: Free updates?
I would think they should start ATS based on the release date of DXP to make all the ATS early adopters happy. I think that would be fair. Some people ponied up the money early which Altium got to use over that time definately without delivering anything. Now that Altium has delivered DXP, the ATS clock should start... Tony -Original Message- From: Bruce Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 5:16 PM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] Re[2]: DXP: Free updates? To make things worse, what about all the poor people who bought Protel in the last year, got the 'FREE' ATS for a year, but it will run out long before DXP has been released for a year? * Tracking #: F50D6392EFDEB345894D96627DF87748B994637C * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
