Harry Lemmens wrote:
...
As someone has stated, Xilinx do indeed give away a VERY GOOD design suite that
gets you easily to several hundred k gates, and covers the entire design very
nicely.
As does Altera. I don't know the others, but it is probably safe to
assume that the smaller players in
On 05:15 PM 13/04/2004, Juha Kuusama said:
Harry Lemmens wrote:
...
As someone has stated, Xilinx do indeed give away a VERY GOOD design
suite that
gets you easily to several hundred k gates, and covers the entire design very
nicely.
As does Altera. I don't know the others, but it is probably
-Original Message-
From: Juha Kuusama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 12:16 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Would it not be nice?
Harry Lemmens wrote:
...
As someone has stated, Xilinx do indeed give away a VERY
GOOD design
suite
At 06:33 PM 4/12/2004, John A. Ross [RSDTV] wrote:
I believe Altium/Protel has lost its 'common sense'... or
maybe PCB designer sense at the very least.
Which is a great pity, as from my understanding, I am sure Mr Lomax will
correct me if I am wrong (as he seems pretty hot on Protel history)
to the mix.
Bill Brooks
PCB Design Engineer , C.I.D., C.I.I.
Tel: (760)597-1500 Ext 3772 Fax: (760)597-1510
-Original Message-
From: Harry Lemmens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 6:36 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Would it not be nice?
I have been
At 03:40 AM 4/13/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think if Altium would decide that they have automated the bypassing
process, it would be the last straw for many people who will realize that
Altium has completely lost it.
In my opinion, this is a narrow view. Yes, bypassing can be a complex
The key thing here John, may be, that Altium will need to have a separate
group of people to service the needs of their Simulation/Nanoboard types
from the PCB/SCH types. They certainly have more issues to respond to.
A full suite of tools says to me.. 'one size fits all'... or more accurately
, 2004 1:43 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Would it not be nice?
The key thing here John, may be, that Altium will need to have a separate
group of people to service the needs of their Simulation/Nanoboard types
from the PCB/SCH types. They certainly have more issues to respond
: John A. Ross [RSDTV] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 3:34 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Would it not be nice?
-Original Message-
From: Brooks,Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 6:43 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re
tool, but in fact do
not!)
Cheers Harry
-Original Message-
From: Brooks,Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:36 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Would it not be nice?
Yes I do get the option of assigning pins based upon the layout... but its
10 matches
Mail list logo
