On 26/07/10 21:36, Manjunath Kudlur wrote:
If you have to do heavy-weight things like optimizing the generated
AST, you got to anyway do it at runtime. You can still inspect the
code, transform it, etc at runtime. (Note : I am not trying to defend
the runtime retained execution model. I am a big
On 26/07/10 21:52, Eric Niebler wrote:
I confess I'm having a hard time seeing how the code posted in
Manjunath's original email could result in something that can be
introspected at runtime. Does it generate byte code? A runtime
polymorphic AST? And the JIT ... does it actually generate machine
I confess I'm having a hard time seeing how the code posted in
Manjunath's original email could result in something that can be
introspected at runtime. Does it generate byte code? A runtime
polymorphic AST? And the JIT ... does it actually generate machine code
that then gets executed?
At
On 26/07/10 22:12, Eric Niebler wrote:
Convincing people of what in your article?
That C++ EDSL are good thanks to templae meta-programming in general
That compile-time introspection is a Good Thing?
Among other
What are the complaints you hear most often?
It's C++ ?!?
Why not making a real
