Re: [proto] grammars, domains and subdomains

2010-12-10 Thread Eric Niebler
On 12/10/2010 3:23 AM, Thomas Heller wrote: I think there is a misunderstanding in how sub-domaining works. The solution you propose is that a sub domain extends its super domain in the way that the expressions in the sub domain also become valid in the super domain. I guess this is the way

Re: [proto] grammars, domains and subdomains

2010-12-10 Thread Thomas Heller
Eric Niebler wrote: On 12/8/2010 5:30 PM, Thomas Heller wrote: I don't really now how to do it otherwise with the current design. There is really only this part of the puzzle missing. If it is done, we have a working and clean Phoenix V3. For the time being, I can live with the workaround

Re: [proto] grammars, domains and subdomains

2010-12-10 Thread Thomas Heller
Eric Niebler wrote: On 12/10/2010 3:23 AM, Thomas Heller wrote: snip However, the solution I am looking for is different. The sub-domain i tried to define should also extend its super domain, BUT expressions valid in this sub-domain should not be valid in the super domain, only in the

Re: [proto] grammars, domains and subdomains

2010-12-10 Thread Eric Niebler
On 12/9/2010 10:51 AM, Thomas Heller wrote: Eric Niebler wrote: On 12/8/2010 5:30 PM, Thomas Heller wrote: I don't really now how to do it otherwise with the current design. There is really only this part of the puzzle missing. If it is done, we have a working and clean Phoenix V3. For the