Re: [proto] [Spirit-devel] [Spirit Development] Bug in today's boost_trunk -- ambiguous operator

2010-12-24 Thread Hartmut Kaiser
--- http://boost-spirit.com Eric Sent via tiny mobile device -Original Message- From: Hartmut Kaiser hartmut.kai...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:55:16 To: 'Eric Niebler'e...@boostpro.com Cc: 'Spirit Development'spirit-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; 'Christopher

Re: [proto] [Spirit-devel] [Spirit Development] Bug in today's boost_trunk -- ambiguous operator

2010-12-25 Thread Hartmut Kaiser
On 12/24/2010 1:57 PM, Hartmut Kaiser wrote: Just because a type is a Fusion sequence, that doesn't mean it has boost::fusion as an associated namespace. I'm asking why boost::fusion::operator is in the overload set. Ohh, sorry, I misunderstood. That's a good question indeed. However, I