Proto grammars and transforms handle this better than evaluators, which are
deprecated. It would pay to look into some examples that use transforms.
Sorry, that's all the advice I have time for at the moment.
\e
On Apr 14, 2016 10:33 AM, "Mathias Gaunard"
wrote:
>
On 14 April 2016 at 15:37, Frank Winter wrote:
>
> and still, I get basically the same error message:
>
> /home/fwinter/src/boost_1_60_0/boost/proto/context/default.hpp:121:41:
> error: no match for ‘operator+’ (operand types are ‘Vector10’ and
> ‘Vector10’)
>
On 04/14/2016 10:10 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
On 14 April 2016 at 14:43, Frank Winter > wrote:
Hi all!
Suppose you'd want to implement a simple EDSL (Embedded Domain
Specific Language) with Boost.proto with the following requirements:
On 14 April 2016 at 14:43, Frank Winter wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Suppose you'd want to implement a simple EDSL (Embedded Domain Specific
> Language) with Boost.proto with the following requirements:
>
> Custom class 'Vector' as terminal
> Classes derived from 'Vector' are
___
proto mailing list
proto@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto