The Nanopb implementation (plain C, not C++) has a max_size option:
string name = 1 [(nanopb).max_size = 40];
will generate the following C declaration:
char name[40];
See http://koti.kapsi.fi/~jpa/nanopb/docs/concepts.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Index: src/google/protobuf/stubs/atomicops.h
===
--- src/google/protobuf/stubs/atomicops.h (revision 423)
+++ src/google/protobuf/stubs/atomicops.h (working copy)
@@ -69,9 +69,9 @@
#if defined(GOOGLE_PROTOBUF_OS_NACL)
//
Hi folks,
given the simple example:
---
package Blah.Messages
message IFoo {
enum Type {
BAR=0;
BAZ=1;
}
optional Type type = 1 [default = BAR];
}
-
class Foo {
private:
Blah::Messages::IFoo my_msg_impl;
public:
typedef Blah::Messages::IFoo::Type Type;
I know the answer is that it doesn't support this, but here's what I'm
wanting to set up to give a clearer view.
Suppose you have a set of nested messages that represent the application
state of an entire application, in this case a game and its entities and
various other stuff. Here's a
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 398 by mjkl...@gmail.com: Compiler Errors in VS2012 - With some
solutions
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=398
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Open the project files in VS2012
I'm trying, for the first time, to get protocol buffers to work sanely
on Windows. It's proving to be harder than I expected.
Partly, it's my own fault: I'm building the project with VS11-beta,
which I'm sure nobody has bothered to make work (and for good reason,
it is right there in the name:
Let's say I have .proto like this:
message Dummy
{
required Attributes DummyAttributes = 1;
required string DummyString = 2;
repeated Attribute DummyAttributes2 = 3;
}
message Attributes
{
repeated Attribute List = 1;
}
message Attribute
{
required string Name = 1;
Three points:
There isn't much value in your Attributes message, so DummyAttributes2 would be
the way I'd go.
List is probably not an ideal name for an field, as it may overlap with other
names depending on programming language.
Per the style guide, field names should be like_this, not
Valid points!
I use Attributes by itself also. So, I need that message. Question is
should I use that collection message inside other messages where I may need
collection of Attribute?
Naming… well. I use same .proto file in .NET and it all comes from POJO
which I used for JSON so I’m going
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 399 by cbsm...@gmail.com: Add support for using batch files to
wrap plugins on Windows
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=399
Windows has this annoying requirement that plugins be .exe's,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Christopher Smith cbsm...@gmail.com wrote:
4) Plugins have to be exe's. That kind of sucks if the plugin is in a
scripting language. I was looking at adding logic so that if you use
the --plugin flag, and if the executable's name ends in .cmd or
.bat, it would
11 matches
Mail list logo
