Not imminently, I'm afraid. Pull requests welcome, of course, but I don't think it's high priority right now.
I've filed https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/2143 to keep track of this. Jon On Monday, 19 September 2016 23:04:00 UTC+1, Teddy Zhang wrote: > > Looks like the custom options API is not exposed yet in 3.0. Is there any > plan to add that? > > On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 9:37:11 AM UTC-7, Jon Skeet wrote: > >> On Thursday, 28 April 2016 22:58:42 UTC+1, TravG wrote: >>> >>> I'm using Protobufs in C# and wondering how I can get access to custom >>> options I've annotated on a field at runtime via reflection. I see some >>> indications that this should be possible: >>> >> >> Hmm... I don't *think* we expose it at the moment. Will look into it. I >> don't want to expose the existing options protos for various reasons. Do >> you have a preferred API in mind? It's probably easiest to keep track of >> this as a Github feature request - are you happy to open one? >> >> Jon >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
