Usually it's recommended to just use the protobuf generated objects as
in-memory model. Or you can embed the proto message objects in your other
Java classes. Is there any specific reason this doesn't work for you?
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 4:43 AM Jay Sharma wrote:
> I have a question regarding "*
Thanks Feng,
That was my expectation, but I just wondered if there is any option that I
can give to protoc to add a prefix to the canonical names.
On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 1:53:54 PM UTC-7, Feng Xiao wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 1:41 PM, 'Jungho Ahn' via Protocol Buffers <
> prot.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 1:41 PM, 'Jungho Ahn' via Protocol Buffers <
protobuf@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to import protos from a third party repo, but they don't have
> proper canonical names.
>
> For example, there is a repo X which has
>
> a/p1.proto
> a/p2.proto with (impo
Hello,
I'm trying to import protos from a third party repo, but they don't have
proper canonical names.
For example, there is a repo X which has
a/p1.proto
a/p2.proto with (import "a/p1.proto")
Since 'a' is too generic, I'd like to add a kind of prefix to the canonical
names like "external/a
