Re: [protobuf] Do protoc 3.5.1 and 2.6.1 generate compatible output?

2018-05-22 Thread 'Feng Xiao' via Protocol Buffers
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:05 PM Tomáš Volf wrote: > We are thinking about switching to newer protocol buffer (current 3.5.1) > but keeping on using proto2 syntax. Under this condition (proto2), does > library created using 3.5.1 generate compatible messages with one compiled > using 2.6.1? > If y

[protobuf] Do protoc 3.5.1 and 2.6.1 generate compatible output?

2018-05-22 Thread Tomáš Volf
We are thinking about switching to newer protocol buffer (current 3.5.1) but keeping on using proto2 syntax. Under this condition (proto2), does library created using 3.5.1 generate compatible messages with one compiled using 2.6.1? >From what I understand it should but I want to make sure. --

Re: [protobuf] 3.5.2 and 3.5.1.1 releases soon?

2018-05-22 Thread 'Jeff Hodges' via Protocol Buffers
Dope! Thank you so much! On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 8:10:56 AM UTC-7, Bo Yang wrote: > > We are working on 3.6 release. ETA is end of month. > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:35 AM 'Jeff Hodges' via Protocol Buffers < > prot...@googlegroups.com > wrote: > >> I've hit on a bug that is fixed in master[

Re: [protobuf] 3.5.2 and 3.5.1.1 releases soon?

2018-05-22 Thread 'Bo Yang' via Protocol Buffers
We are working on 3.6 release. ETA is end of month. On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:35 AM 'Jeff Hodges' via Protocol Buffers < protobuf@googlegroups.com> wrote: > I've hit on a bug that is fixed in master[1], and, I believe, in the 3.5.2 > tag. Both the 3.5.1.1 and the 3.5.2 tag have been around for 4

[protobuf] 3.5.2 and 3.5.1.1 releases soon?

2018-05-22 Thread 'Jeff Hodges' via Protocol Buffers
I've hit on a bug that is fixed in master[1], and, I believe, in the 3.5.2 tag. Both the 3.5.1.1 and the 3.5.2 tag have been around for 4 and 2 months, respectively, but there haven't been any official releases. Are those two tags going to get an official release on