[protobuf] Re: Q: v2 field numbering scope

2019-03-15 Thread Michael Powell
On Thursday, March 14, 2019 at 8:48:54 PM UTC-4, Michael Powell wrote: > > Hello, > > I am scanning through the v2 language guide, and the reserved field > numbers as well as the allowed field numbers makes sense. > > What does not make sense is the scope. Is the scope contained with in a >

Re: [protobuf] can proto 3 message's bytes parsed by proto2?

2019-03-15 Thread Michael Powell
On Thursday, March 14, 2019 at 2:12:31 PM UTC-4, Adam Cozzette wrote: > > Going from proto3 to proto2 should be fine. There are some slight > differences but I can't think of any major problems. The only thing that > comes to mind is that proto2 handles unknown enum values a little bit >