[protobuf] Protocol Buffers Version 24.3 is Released!

2023-09-07 Thread 'Hong Shin' via Protocol Buffers
This version includes the following non-breaking changes: C++ - Workaround ICE on gcc 7.5 by not having one overload call the other one with a (#13808 ) (398a84c

Re: [protobuf] Status of string_view, repeated Cord or string_view fields?

2023-09-07 Thread Jeffrey Baker
Yes, that all makes good sense. The v23 release notes state that extension of Cord to repeated fields and string fields is contingent on some expression of interest. Despite the fact that my project is proprietary and not open source, I hope you consider my expression of interest to be on the

Re: [protobuf] Status of string_view, repeated Cord or string_view fields?

2023-09-07 Thread 'Matthew Fowles Kulukundis' via Protocol Buffers
Jeffrey~ We omitted `repeated` Cord simply out of an abundance of caution. If we don't see issues come up with the existing Cord, we can expand it quite easily. Internal to google, there is already support for repeated field of cord. string_view aliasing is a bit of a longer term thing. We

Re: [protobuf] OpenTelemetry JSON Protobuf deviations

2023-09-07 Thread 'Jerry Berg' via Protocol Buffers
Hi John, Is the Java implementation of JSON Format for protobuf not working for you? https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/java/util/src/main/java/com/google/protobuf/util/JsonFormat.java On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 9:16 AM 'John Green' via Protocol Buffers <

[protobuf] OpenTelemetry JSON Protobuf deviations

2023-09-07 Thread 'John Green' via Protocol Buffers
Hi all! OpenTelemetry documents some deviations regarding mapping protobuf/json. See here: https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/otlp/#json-protobuf-encoding Is there a way to implement those deviations with the java SDK? Thanks for your help! -- You received this message because you are