Looks like the custom options API is not exposed yet in 3.0. Is there any
plan to add that?
On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 9:37:11 AM UTC-7, Jon Skeet wrote:
> On Thursday, 28 April 2016 22:58:42 UTC+1, TravG wrote:
>>
>> I'm using Protobufs in C# and wondering how I can get access to custom
>>
I've created an issue for this:
https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/1606
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 11:32:03 AM UTC-7, Feng Xiao wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Teddy Zhang <losti...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I'm really not happy to see that proto3 removed the ability in generate
>> code for check whether a fie
On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 11:32:03 AM UTC-7, Feng Xiao wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Teddy Zhang <losti...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I'm really not happy to see that proto3 removed the ability in generate
>> code for check whether a fie
I'm really not happy to see that proto3 removed the ability in generate
code for check whether a field exits or not.
For a message like this:
message Test1 {
required int32 a = 1;
}
If field a is present, the encoded message will have field with id 1 and
its value. If the field is not set,
I notice that for ProtoBuf 3 generated classes, they have fields
numbers there.
E.g. for C#:
> public const int LatitudeFieldNumber = 1;
>
> private float latitude_;
> public float Latitude {
> get { return latitude_; }
> set {
> latitude_ = value;
> }
>
Sorry to dig this old thread.
I now one of the solution right now is to put the enum to different proto
file and put them into different package. But that doesn't really work if
the enums are under the same message.
I would suggest add an option for c/c++, like below:
enum Foo {
option
+Jon who seems to be the developer on this.
On Monday, November 2, 2015 at 6:18:27 PM UTC-8, Teddy Zhang wrote:
>
> I need to override the ToString behavior in C# to make it human readable.
>
> E.g. I defined a message type to represent DateTime in C#, and then write
> a partia
Will the C# implementation support proto2 messages?
What is the capability story? I assume the wire format is compatible if no
proto3 exclusive features are used?
On Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 5:43:36 AM UTC-7, Jon Skeet wrote:
> That looks like you're expecting a protobuf.net-style approach -
Will the C# implementation support proto2 message as well?
What is the compatibility story between proto2 and proto 3? I assume the
wire format is compatible as long as no proto 3 exclusive features are used.
On Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 5:43:36 AM UTC-7, Jon Skeet wrote:
> That looks like
10 matches
Mail list logo
