this change without updating millions of lines of
existing C++ code that uses protobuf enums?
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:12 AM, alopecoid alopec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This post is about the fact that protobuf enum values use C++ scoping
rules, meaning that, unlike in Java, enum values
Hi,
Using the Java API, when attempting to parse a text-formatted protobuf
message that contains adjacent strings that are meant to be
concatenated, such as in the following contrived example:
name:John Smith
profession:mailman
description:
all these strings
are concatenated
Hi,
Can serialized messages be used reliably as keys?
In other words, is it guaranteed that...
- Two equal messages will always generate equal byte sequences?
(Are fields always written in the same order?)
- Two unequal messages will always generate unequal byte sequences?
(Are tag
Hi,
I haven't actually used the Java protobuf API, but it seems to me from
the quick occasional glance that this isn't entirely true. I mean,
specifically in response to the code snippet posted in the original
message, I would possibly:
1. Reuse the Builder object by calling its clear() method.
Hi Kenton,
Thanks for your reply.
You can't continue to use a Builder after calling build(). Even if we made
it so you could, it would be building an entirely new object, not reusing
the old one. We can't make it reuse the old one because that would break
the immutability guarantee of
