Hi,
I ported Charles Law's work to a recent version of protobut so that tests
would pass both with Python 3.3 and Cygwin's python 2.7 (both on Win 7
x86_64). Posted patch against svn checkout 519 but the message got
immediately deleted.
--
You received this message because you are
Hi everybody,
What's the status of Python 3 support? I'd like to use protocol buffers in
my new Python 3.4-based project.
Thanks,
Ram.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Ram Rachum ram.rac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
What's the status of Python 3 support? I'd like to use protocol buffers in
my new Python 3.4-based project.
The next major release will support python 3. It'll probably be released in
Q3 as protobuf 2.6.0
Thanks Feng.
On one hand I'm happy that Protobuf will support Python 3, on the other
hand having to wait until October-December 2014 will mean that I'll have to
start my project using Python 2, and I'd really like to start it with
Python 3.
Maybe there's a pure-Python implementation of protobuf
I have the python 2.6+ 3.2+ compatible code done. Search the mailing
list for python3 (no space) for more details.
On Thursday, March 7, 2013 1:05:59 PM UTC-8, Charles Law wrote:
I did some work on this a few months back. If you search the mailing list
for python3 (no space) you can find
Hi! I\m also very interested in prtobuf support inPy3. Are there any newsin
this topic?
W dniu środa, 11 lipca 2012 14:59:37 UTC+2 użytkownik Roberto Alsina
napisał:
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:13:54 PM UTC-3, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
[resending, initial send didn't make it to the list]
Hello, as part of porting one a product to Python 3, we are willing to port
protobuf which is one of our dependencies.
Would a python 2.6 / 3.3 codebase be acceptable for merging upstream? Or
would it have to support 2.4?
I ask because the effor to achieve both is quite different.
On Monday,
[resending, initial send didn't make it to the list]
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:06:34 AM UTC-7, Roberto Alsina wrote:
Hello, as part of porting one a product to Python 3, we are willing to
port protobuf which is one of our dependencies.
Would a python 2.6 / 3.3 codebase be acceptable for
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:05 AM, maxw mwindi...@videotron.ca wrote:
As far as I can tell, the python protocol buffer code is not yet
compatible with python 3.x. I found a few messages in this discussion
forum indicating that some people had worked on this, but I saw no
pointer to actual code.
