[protobuf] Re: Issue 192 in protobuf: C++0x conformance issue: using reserved keyword 'nullptr' as a name of variable

Updates: Status: Accepted Owner: ken...@google.com Comment #3 on issue 192 by ken...@google.com: C++0x conformance issue: using reserved keyword 'nullptr' as a name of variable http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=192 Thanks, will include in next release. --

[protobuf] Re: Issue 192 in protobuf: C++0x conformance issue: using reserved keyword 'nullptr' as a name of variable

Updates: Status: NeedPatchFromUser Owner: --- Comment #1 on issue 192 by jas...@google.com: C++0x conformance issue: using reserved keyword 'nullptr' as a name of variable http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=192 We haven't started compiling with c++0x yet, can

[protobuf] Re: Issue 192 in protobuf: C++0x conformance issue: using reserved keyword 'nullptr' as a name of variable

Comment #2 on issue 192 by vdolya: C++0x conformance issue: using reserved keyword 'nullptr' as a name of variable http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=192 Yes. It's in attached file. Attachments: nullptr_reserved.patch 1.4 KB -- You received this message because you