[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2014-10-06 Thread protobuf
Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #26 on issue 81 by xiaof...@google.com: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2014-10-06 Thread protobuf
Issue 81: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 This issue is now blocking issue protobuf:138. See https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=138 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2014-10-06 Thread protobuf
Issue 81: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 This issue is now blocking issue protobuf:138. See https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=138 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2014-10-06 Thread protobuf
Issue 81: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 This issue is now blocking issue protobuf:149. See https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=149 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2014-10-06 Thread protobuf
Issue 81: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 This issue is now blocking issue protobuf:149. See https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=149 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2014-10-06 Thread protobuf
Issue 81: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 This issue is now blocking issue protobuf:152. See https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=152 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2014-10-06 Thread protobuf
Issue 81: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 This issue is now blocking issue protobuf:152. See https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=152 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2014-10-06 Thread protobuf
Issue 81: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 This issue is now blocking issue protobuf:250. See https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=250 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2014-10-06 Thread protobuf
Issue 81: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 This issue is now blocking issue protobuf:250. See https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=250 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2012-09-25 Thread protobuf
Comment #24 on issue 81 by nickm...@gmail.com: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 I noticed the other day that there is a warning in the protoc maven plugin code generated by the latest Eclipse Juno that suggested there was a resource

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2012-09-25 Thread protobuf
Comment #25 on issue 81 by g...@google.com: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 Take a look at comment #20. It seems that others have developed a plugin that was less experimental and better-supported. You're probably better off switching

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2011-03-19 Thread protobuf
Comment #23 on issue 81 by facto...@gmail.com: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 Would classifiers (e.g. classifierwindows/classifier) help in the creation of platform-dependent artifacts? -- You received this message because you are

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2011-01-27 Thread protobuf
Comment #22 on issue 81 by g...@google.com: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 I don't believe that Maven has any support for platform-dependent artifacts. That said, it might be worth documenting installation via some of the different

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2011-01-26 Thread protobuf
Issue 81: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 This issue is now blocking issue 138. See http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=138 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2011-01-26 Thread protobuf
Issue 81: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 This issue is now blocking issue 149. See http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=149 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2011-01-26 Thread protobuf
Comment #21 on issue 81 by jaso...@gmail.com: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 I don't suppose the protoc compiler itself could be distributed as a maven artifact? It would be great to be able to specify it in the pom instead of having

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2010-07-20 Thread protobuf
Comment #19 on issue 81 by ken...@google.com: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 Hi all, It seems clear that Greg doesn't have time to maintain this, and I can't maintain it either as I know nothing about Maven. Would someone like to

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2010-07-14 Thread protobuf
Comment #18 on issue 81 by akbertram: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 Can we merge into the trunk in time for release 2.3.1 ? Here is a patch that merges this the maven-plugin branch into r344 and fixes issues #138 and #149 and #152

[protobuf] Re: Issue 81 in protobuf: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review

2010-05-11 Thread protobuf
Comment #17 on issue 81 by walker.zach: Maven Protoc Plugin Code Review http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=81 I think my comment is similar to the issues raised by comments 5 and 15. I attempted to use the plugin to generate code from a .proto file that imported messages